Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: News And Other Updates Leading Up To Pats-Giants

Remembering Wark and Rex...

88648_nuggets_shake_up_basketball_medium_mediumI've had the pleasure of meeting Mark Warkentien and Rex Chapman on a number of occasions.  Both are good guys.  Both deserved to be treated better on their way out of Denver.

Star-divide

One was gregarious, gracious and out-going, quick with a smile, a handshake and a pat on the back, and always up for small talk before tip-offs and during post-games.

The other hid in his office during games and could be argumentative and condescending with outsiders and the media, a personality likely honed from years and years of working tirelessly for spoiled athletes and eccentric owners, but never getting the credit he deserved.

Both were good executives.  Both were loyal stewards for the Nuggets organization. 

Both are good men. 

Neither deserved to be treated this way.

Late Tuesday was a sad afternoon at Nuggets headquarters when Kroenke Sports Enterprises president Paul Andrews announced that the contracts of the Nuggets two general managers, vice president of basketball operations Mark Warkentien and vice president of player personnel Rex Chapman, would not be renewed. 

In other words, Wark and Rex (as I liked to call them) were fired.

When Warkentien arrived in September 2005 followed by Chapman in 2006 to take over basketball operations from general manager Kiki Vandeweghe (who was let go in May 2006) and assistant GMs Jeff Weltman and David Fredman (let go soon before Chapman's hiring), they inherited a competitive, up-and-coming team whose future had been mortgaged by the disastrous trade-and-sign for Kenyon Martin in 2004. 

So onerous was K-Mart’s deal (and the three first round draft picks that disappeared with it) that Warkentien and Chapman had very little margin for error.  But despite the financial stranglehold placed upon them, Warkentien and Chapman – along with team adviser Bret Bearup – added the pieces that made the Nuggets an NBA Finals contender for the first time in 25 years.  Such success earned Warkentien the NBA’s Executive of the Year Award in 2009 and Chapman received a vote for the award, as well.

This isn’t to say they always did a great job.  After the 2007-08 season concluded, I – and many others – questioned the culture that Nuggets basketball was devolving into under the Bearup, Warkentien and Chapman regime.  They may have assembled the most talented team in basketball on paper, but the team’s "rap sheet" far exceeded their playoff win total as management seemed too concerned with talent over character.  Despite having owner Stan Kroenke’s $83 million to play with, the Nuggets were becoming dangerously close to morphing into the Jailblazers 2.0 – a team that, coincidentally, was co-architected by Warkentien in Portland just a few seasons earlier.  Lest we forget that Warkentien was ready to bring Jamaal Tinsley and Zach Randolph ino the Mile High City, as well.

Presumably (and understandably) furious with an $83 million payroll equaling zero playoff series victories, a number of run-ins with the law among the players and an ever more embarrassing 2008 playoff sweep as an unacceptably low eighth-seed, Kroenke ordered fiscal prudence combined with keeping the Nuggets competitive prior to the beginning of the 2008-09 campaign.  And it was under that directive from ownership Bearup, Warkentien and Chapman thrived. 

Out was the talented but oft-injured Marcus Camby and in was salary cap flexibility.  Out was the talented but expensive, high maintenance and quickly aging Allen Iverson and in was the classy, professional, former NBA Finals MVP (and local hero) Chauncey Billups.  Out were useless characters like DerMarr Johnson, Ruben Patterson, Chucky Atkins and Reggie Evans.  In were high-character guys like Dahntay Jones, Chris Andersen, Ty Lawson and Arron Afflalo.

The results on the floor spoke for themselves.  Under the Bearup, Warkentien and Chapman administration, the Nuggets – for the first time in franchise history – won 50 regular season games three consecutive times, appeared in their second Western Conference Finals and had the Nuggets "in the conversation" of elite NBA teams.  Just recently, SB Nation's NBA guru Mike Prada ranked Warkentien fifth among all 30 NBA general managers.

And for all that, Warkentien and Chapman are jobless, leaving Bearup, Stan and Josh Kroenke searching for a new general manager.

While I sincerely appreciate what the Kroenkes have done for professional basketball in Denver (need I bring up the previous ownership group as a reminder of what a disaster things were around here before Stan bought the team), I’m seeing a pattern emerge in how they handle their business with top executives that I'm not enamored with.  Like Kiki Vandeweghe, Jeff Weltman and David Fredman before them, Warkentien and Chapman were left to twist in the wind as Kroenke and Andrews teased them with the possibility of a contract extension while other NBA teams filled their vacant management positions.  The organization pulled the same stunt in the handling of George Karl’s expiring contract, which makes you wonder if Karl would even have been re-signed at all had he not gotten sick. 

All this begs the obvious question: if the Kroenkes were resolute on not bringing back Warkentien or Chapman, why wait this long to formally announce the decision?

One theory is to follow the money.  With Warkentien and Chapman under contract until August’s end, perhaps Kroenke figured he’d use their services through the draft and free agency – i.e. get his money’s worth – and then bring in someone new come September 1st so he didn’t have to pay out more in GM salary than he already had to.

Another theory is that Warkentien and Chapman had the summer of 2010 to prove themselves worthy of an extension and didn’t come through.  While everyone in Denver is enthused by the signing of Al Harrington, no one will mistake his arrival as something that gets the Nuggets back to the conference finals.  And the Nuggets inability to get into the 2010 NBA Draft – first or second round – or deal for a legitimate big man may have sealed Warkentien and Chapman’s collective fate.

A few months ago, I was pinned down by 104.3 The Fan’s Sandy Clough to pick one or the other - Warkentien or Chapman - and I sided with Warkentien while noting that I liked the balance the two brought to the organization.  I’ve always felt that Warkentien knew how to get deals done and found deals that most of his peers couldn’t - an essential talent in a small market like Denver.  Warkentien's acquisitions of J.R. Smith and Arron Afflalo are just two examples of his work at its best.  My instincts have since proven to be right as Andrews acknowledged to Fanhouse’s Chris Tomasson that Chapman never had negotiating authority and head coach George Karl’s comments in the wake of the firings were only about Warkentien while making no mention of Chapman whatsoever.

To be clear, I don't have an issue with the Nuggets moving in a new direction with management.  Maybe Warkentien and Chapman finally wore out their welcome and it was time to move on.  I just wish that the Kroenkes and Andrews would be more upfront with those who serve their organization loyally, especially if it enables ex-employees to find employment elsewhere before it's too late.  And while the Nuggets gave Warkentien permission to interview with other teams, I wouldn't be surprised if the carrot of returning to Denver encumbered him and his agent's ability to negotiate elsewhere.

Moving forward, if I were Stan and Josh Kroenke I'd have already signed former Trail Blazers GM Kevin Pritchard to become the Nuggets next GM.  Other than missing on Kevin Durant to draft Greg Oden (something Blazers owner Paul Allen allegedly insisted on anyway), Pritchard did a masterful job rebuilding a Portland team torn asunder by many of the moves Warkentien and former GM Bob Whitsitt made years ago.  I’ve heard Pritchard may have too big a personality to fit in with the under-the-radar Kroenkes and the behind-the-scenes Bearup, but he’s a talented executive in addition to being a former player.  I believe Pritchard would be a great fit here.

The other names being bandied about are intriguing.  Tommy Sheppard – the former director of player relations and team services for the Nuggets now working for the Wizards – is a super nice and classy guy with Denver roots, but I think it’s fair to question whether or not we should hire a former media relations man to run the basketball personnel side of things (just look how well it’s working out in Minnesota with David Kahn). 

I’m not as familiar with the other names that surfaced on Tuesday - either David Griffin (formerly of the Suns) or Masai Ujiri (a former Nuggets scout currently with the Raptors).  Doing some digging on Griffin, he worked with Steve Kerr to bring in the likes of Jared Dudley, Robin Lopez, Goran Dragic and Channing Frye to Phoenix.  A guy with that pedigree could be a great fit in Denver where finding diamonds-in-the-rough is necessary for future success.  Ujiri, a Nigerian-born basketball executive with an international scouting background, would bring an international element that a small market team like the Nuggets could really use. 

I’ll wrap up my thoughts on the Nuggets GM situation with a quick story about my first run-in with Mark Warkentien.  Prior to the tipoff at Pepsi Center of the Nuggets/Lakers Western Conference Finals Game 3 in 2009, I found myself chatting with a few Nuggets executives including their head of statistical analysis, Dean Oliver, near courtside.  Just a few seats away was Warkentien, whom I had just met and congratulated on winning the NBA’s Executive of the Year Award.  Out of nowhere, Warkentien interrupts our conversation by saying: "Andrew, you’re a smart guy and a great writer, but your entire argument for firing George Karl [referring to the four months of 2008 when firegeorgekarl.com existed] was total horseshit.  You have no idea how hard it is to win 50 games in this league.  And you have no idea how tough that locker room was."  (Nevermind that Warkentien forgot to acknowledge who assembled many of the characters in that locker room in the first place.) 

With Warkentien being an adamant Karl supporter, I didn’t blame him for standing up for his good friend but still felt the need to defend myself, especially since I had changed the site’s mantra more than a year earlier and had been bullish on Karl from the start of the 2008-09 season.  I countered with something along the lines of: "I’ve been very bullish on George all year.  But that doesn’t change the fact that 50 wins isn’t an accomplishment when a team is expected to compete for a championship.  Last I checked, barely making the playoffs and getting swept in the first round isn’t an accomplishment." 

"Who expected them to compete for a championship?  Who?" Warkentien asked. 

"How about the fans, the experts, Carmelo Anthony [who had predicted a 60-win season during training camp], Stan’s $83 million payroll?" I replied.  "You don’t know what you’re talking about," Wark went on, "who are these experts?  They don’t know how hard it is to win 50 games. And you just have no idea what that locker room was like." (Again, disregarding that he was responsible for assembling those players together). 

Then, in his condescending and snarky manner that fans became accustomed to in his always interesting radio interviews, Warkentien directed the conversation back at me: "Let me ask you something: how many games were the Nuggets favored to beat the Lakers last year?  How many?"  I tried to reply: "None, but…"  Warkentien cut me off: "Exactly. None!"  "But that’s not the point," I countered.  "My point is that that team shouldn’t have been an eighth seed in the first place."  Both knowing the argument was going nowhere, we kind of shrugged our shoulders, continued watching pre-game warm-ups and implicitly agreed to disagree. 

Never wanting to leave things on bad footing, I then said: "You have to give me a little credit.  After I realized what was going on [here in Denver], I changed the name of the site to Denver Stiffs and have been very supportive of George all season.  I even advocated for him to get Coach of the Year consideration."

"That award means nothing," Warkentien retorted.  He then turned to Dean Oliver.  "Hey Dean, tell young Andrew here how many Coach of the Year winners stay with their teams after winning the award?"  Oliver would go on to explain that every Coach of the Year Award winner – with very few exceptions – dating back 20-something years had either quit or been fired from their teams within two or three years of winning the award.  "See," said Warkentien.  "It means nothing!"

I then asked Oliver: "Hey Dean, how many Executive of the Year Award winners stay with their teams soon after winning the award?"  Warkentien, the current award recipient, got a good chuckle out of that line and I figured I’d leave on that note.  Now I feel kind of bad for saying it.  

Before heading back to my seat, I shook Warkentien’s hand, he winked (but didn't smile) at me and said: "Keep up the good work."  

Warkentien, closer to 60 years old than he is to 50, may have just lost his last NBA job.  Chapman - always the class act as evident by his post-firing comments - will undoubtedly find work elsewhere as either a team executive or broadcaster. 

Both will be missed and I wish them and their families the very best.

Photo courtesy of AP: Jack Dempsey

Comment 48 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I don’t know why you think Wark and Rex deserved better. They had an awesome job. They performed it competently. But they fell short of accomplishing the ultimate goal and recently made several clear, and clearly acknowledged mistakes. They came out and said that if they knew they were going to have injury problems with their big men, they would have gotten another big man. Newsflash, everyone and their mother knew that every one of the Nuggets big men has an incredible injury history and that they really needed another big man.

They knew when there contract was going to be up. The owner gave them the entire length of their contract to demonstrate that they should be retained. What we got was, in part, that incredibly embarrassing pity party about how they tried everything to get into the draft but just couldn’t get it done, this in a draft when a team got a first round pick for cash. And then we got to see the guy they targeted, Caracter, look like a legit player in summer league (I saw him in person, he’s an NBA player).

You do those kinds of things, and the owner decides that maybe it’s a time for a change. He didn’t fire them. He just didn’t give them a big, shiny new contract.

I appreciate what Wark and Rex have done. When I went to those playoff games last year, I knew at the time that this might be the farthest I would see the Nuggets go in my lifetime. And I enjoyed it (except for Game 3 of the WCF, when I almost gave up watching basketbal). But a lot of guys can do a competent job at running an NBA team. Kroenke wants to see if he can find something better. I’m never going to blame Kroenke for setting his sights higher than the status quo, when the status quo has not gotten it done.

And I’m going to have a hard time feeling bad for guys who got to do my dream job, were allowed to play out their entire contracts, and are almost certain to find similar work in the future. Especially ones who are going to make arguments like

how many games were the Nuggets favored to beat the Lakers last year? How many?
and not see the problems with it.

by asdqqq on Aug 4, 2010 8:25 PM MDT reply actions  

It's not the why, but the how...

…but I appreciate what you’re saying and am looking forward to a new regime to pick apart!

Andrew Feinstein | DenverStiffs.com | denverstiffs@gmail.com

by Andrew Feinstein on Aug 4, 2010 8:32 PM MDT up reply actions  

Looks like NY wants Warkentein... idk if thats a good fit though...

I’ll miss them both and will always be left wondering how good they could’ve made this team had they not had their money restraints from Stan.

As much as I want Pritchard to become our new GM, I don’t think Stan will go that route… supposedly Pritch has a huge ego and that’s not the kind of guy Stan hires. He doesn’t want someone who will clash with him or try to get more power. Not to mention Stan always hires his close friends (most of the Nuggets organization is made up of his friends), so idk if he’d give arguably the most important position to someone he doesn’t know he could trust.

I’m a firm believer that to have a good NBA team, it starts with the GM. That’s why I don’t think saving money on a GM is something Stan should even consider . This is one thing he can’t cheap out on.

And if money isn’t an issue I can’t see why Pritchard wouldn’t get the job. Griffin and Sheppard intrigue me, but I’m kind of scared that they could be the next David Kahn, which would be horrible. I would prefer to go the safe route and just get the experienced and well known GM in Pritch. I think even though either Griffin or Sheppard or some other guys have high potential and could be the next Sam Presti, but I’d prefer to avoid the risk, and go with something you know what you’re gonna get with (which is Pritchard).

by hvino on Aug 4, 2010 8:30 PM MDT reply actions  

if wark was in Melo's corner

maybe he’d add extra pull to NY.

Not that I imagine any team would hire a GM just to lure one player, but it might be a bonus for them.

by deezNuggets on Aug 4, 2010 11:40 PM MDT up reply actions  

Who owns the T-Wolves?

I’m just trying to understand how it goes down when Kahn makes a pitch to the owner and says “yeah, so here’s what I’m thinking, we draft only point guards with all those picks we have.” Kroenke would laugh the guy out of the room.

by Artimus Mangilord on Aug 5, 2010 10:47 AM MDT up reply actions  

I really thought they would keep Wark toward the end

but as far as deserving better….dunno. The only thing I’ll say is they deserved to be let go sooner (after the season) so a new regime could go through the draft and the Free Agency period. That was extremely poor timing by Josh and Stan

"If there's a new way....I'll be the first in line. But it better work this time...." Peace Sells....but Who's Buying

Proving that you can be gay and not like Madonna, and rock out to Metal. One step at a time.

Quitter's People United Member # 78

by jpage78 on Aug 4, 2010 8:34 PM MDT reply actions  

My point exactly...

…see jpage, we can agree on something!

Andrew Feinstein | DenverStiffs.com | denverstiffs@gmail.com

by Andrew Feinstein on Aug 4, 2010 8:35 PM MDT up reply actions  

don't tell anyone Andrew

it will destroy the illusion :-p

"If there's a new way....I'll be the first in line. But it better work this time...." Peace Sells....but Who's Buying

Proving that you can be gay and not like Madonna, and rock out to Metal. One step at a time.

Quitter's People United Member # 78

by jpage78 on Aug 4, 2010 8:36 PM MDT up reply actions  

Not to mention, that I bet one of them would've at least gotten serious consideration for one of the multiple open office jobs throughout the NBA

I know we don’t owe them anything, b/c it’s a business, but it’s really dick to fire a guy after all the jobs he could’ve gotten are now mostly filled.

by hvino on Aug 4, 2010 8:37 PM MDT up reply actions  

Prior to free agency or anything

Wark had already gotten permission to talk with other teams about positions. He was a candidate several places, but none of them decided to hire him.

by asdqqq on Aug 4, 2010 8:43 PM MDT up reply actions  

this is true

I wonder, however, if those were cursory interviews done as a negotiating ploy with Kroenke Sports.

"If there's a new way....I'll be the first in line. But it better work this time...." Peace Sells....but Who's Buying

Proving that you can be gay and not like Madonna, and rock out to Metal. One step at a time.

Quitter's People United Member # 78

by jpage78 on Aug 4, 2010 8:53 PM MDT up reply actions  

They weren't fired

Their contracts were not renewed. No reason they couldn’t have been (weren’t) inquiring with other teams.

by Artimus Mangilord on Aug 5, 2010 10:49 AM MDT up reply actions  

I bet

if Kroenke had gone to Wark and Rex at the end of last season and said, “I’m thinking of letting you guys go, would you rather I do it know or let you make your case until your contracts run out,” they would have chosen to play it out. B/c they’ve got sweet jobs. The only way I see it as unclassy to do it the way he did is if he absolutely knew he wouldn’t bring them back no matter what happened once last season ended. If he wasn’t sure, then I respect him for giving them a final chance to make their case.

by asdqqq on Aug 4, 2010 8:41 PM MDT up reply actions  

Also as much as I like Warkentein (not so much Chapman), but considering I've never met either, I guess I can't judge

They did make a couple of mistakes and the way they gave away assets or let them go really pissed me off. Maybe it was Stan’s pushing that caused it, but I still feel like they could’ve gotten a good player for the TPE and/or gotten a good player at the TPE. Not to mention that Steven Hunter trade…that always pissed me off. I understand getting rid of a contract, but why before the season? I guarantee we could’ve gotten Tyrus Thomas from Chicago if we offered Hunter, that first and Graham (and/ or Petro), but b/c Stan didn’t want to pay the lux tax bill early, he dumped him in August. Even I know that luxury tax is counted for until the last day of the season, so why do such a herky jerky move so soon.

by hvino on Aug 4, 2010 8:35 PM MDT reply actions  

I met Chapman several times

and he always struck me as…..disingenuous. Kinda like a publicity hound. I always knew when Chapman was the idea behind a deal because he was always appearing on talk shows and Jim Rome. Oh well.

All I know is with Wark gone, Melo’s biggest supporter is gone. I can’t help but think that this will have a serious impact on what happens with the contract extension.

"If there's a new way....I'll be the first in line. But it better work this time...." Peace Sells....but Who's Buying

Proving that you can be gay and not like Madonna, and rock out to Metal. One step at a time.

Quitter's People United Member # 78

by jpage78 on Aug 4, 2010 8:42 PM MDT reply actions  

For what it's worth...

…every time I bumped into Rex he’d ask how this site was doing. Couldn’t have been a nicer guy to me but we certainly never got to know each other well.

Andrew Feinstein | DenverStiffs.com | denverstiffs@gmail.com

by Andrew Feinstein on Aug 4, 2010 8:45 PM MDT up reply actions  

I'm sure that your interactions with Rex were genuine

as were mine. Yet Wark always struck me as the real deal. He was the same weather being interviewed or having a private conversation. Much like your experience with him.

Both needed to go, truth be told. The timing of this STINKS however. It doesn’t make sense to do this when you are hoping your superstar signs an extension…

….or do they not care? Needs to be asked.

"If there's a new way....I'll be the first in line. But it better work this time...." Peace Sells....but Who's Buying

Proving that you can be gay and not like Madonna, and rock out to Metal. One step at a time.

Quitter's People United Member # 78

by jpage78 on Aug 4, 2010 8:49 PM MDT up reply actions  

Nah.

I’m not really all that impressed by Pritchard. He always seemed to overvalue his own guys and to lose sight of the goal, building a championship team, not amassing the most talent. He’d be a solid GM choice, but I’m not sure he’s any better than Wark. So I don’t see any need to petition for him.

Now a petition to bring Paul Allen’s money to Denver? That I’d sign. A lot of the good stuff Pritchard did was, imo, largely due to the blank check he got to get things done. Perhaps the more important question than who the new GM will be is if Josh’s increased involvement comes along with an increased willingness to open his father’s check book.

by asdqqq on Aug 4, 2010 9:26 PM MDT up reply actions  

Interesting point that bears repeating
He always seemed to overvalue his own guys and to lose sight of the goal, building a championship team, not amassing the most talent.

I wonder how often GM’s seriously ponder the sentiment of that statement.

by Artimus Mangilord on Aug 5, 2010 11:08 AM MDT up reply actions  

I won't create it, but I'll sign it

Look, I dont’ know what the hell happened in Portland to cause Pritchard to be released, but what he built while he was there was undeniable and the aggressiveness he possesses is the best in the league. He’s the type of GM I want.

Stiff 4 Life

by GoldenNugget on Aug 4, 2010 11:50 PM MDT up reply actions  

I wish Wark & Rex well and good luck but I won't miss Wark and his tiresome act

The final nail in Wark’s coffin was on the day of the draft he was on a morning radio show being interviewed and he was doing his usual bullying and condescending towards the radio hosts.

When asked about the draft, rather than just giving a sincere answer to the question Wark pulled another pile of rhetoric out of his bag and tried to say the draft was like taking his wife shopping… they’re not planning to do anything but if they see something.

Then he said something else that was a little disturbing. When asked about the Nugs’ need to acquire another big, Wark was trying to sell the radio audience that the Nugs 2010 new “big” would be… Balkman!

At that moment I thought “oh you’re so gone”.

"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
"Remember the Alamo", "Remember the Maine", "Remember the Hunter Trade"
"Contenders commit to building a champion; pretenders end up getting bit right on their pick axe"

by the word on Aug 4, 2010 10:16 PM MDT reply actions  

Bravo!

Great read Feinstein. I loved the way you intertwined the conversation with Wark into the article and I can’t actually believe you had the balls to be that up front with him like that. That’s what being a journalist (or fan advocate) is all about.

I gotta say at this point in time I’m really liking the idea of Griffen. I love Phoenix’s team right now and the way they still remained competitive even after the departures of Marion, Bell, Shaq and Diaw who all played key rolls in their prior success.

Stiff 4 Life

by GoldenNugget on Aug 4, 2010 11:20 PM MDT reply actions  

Just read that article on the best GMs

Another great read. That guy did a fantastic job with his rankings for the most part. A couple of names we should probably consider from that article are Steve Kerr and Rod Thorn. Both those guys had Confrence Finals appearances while under their watch and one even had a Finals appearance (Thorn), not to mention they both have made some great trades as well.

Stiff 4 Life

by GoldenNugget on Aug 5, 2010 1:03 AM MDT up reply actions  

Fascinating story about Wark...

I’ve heard the arguments against this and considered them carefully. I’m just not buying that Warkentein absolutely deserved the extension. This is the right move for the Nuggets, the only sour part about it is not letting them go earlier to compete for other management jobs that are now taken.

The problem I have with Wark is the slimy, condescending way he tried to be candid about the job when talking to fans. The absolute utter horseshit about “Big Bertha” stands out among the his stupid poker and chess analogies. Reading about this argument with Andrew was actually pretty upsetting to me. Does Wark have a point? Yes, but chastising the fans for dreaming big is crossing the line. He admitted what a grave mistake 2008 was by dumping Camby and trading A.I. to fix it – and if it wasn’t so beneath him to be honest in front of a fan he would have admitted as much right there. Instead we get this hiding behind 50 wins and bad locker room bullshit.

If Wark delivered Melo he would have stayed no question. He didn’t, and in the following weeks he proved that he can’t. Wark can now take his 50 win resume, his Big Bertha golf clubs and his poker chips to another middling team searching for playoff mediocrity.

What have you done for me lately is a fair question. In Mark’s case, the answer is not much. The final nail in the coffin – trading Steve Hunter’s expiring and 2010 first round to Memphis for jack shit. Oh, and trading Sonny Weems and filler to Milwaukee for Malik Allen’s guaranteed deal. 50 wins is great and all, and we’ll look back on Wark’s time here as some decent years. If the Nuggets are dreaming for anything bigger than that – they needed to change. Wark finally ran out of chess moves and bluffed off the last of his poker chips. With Bearup, Dean Oliver, and Josh Kroenke still here half of the management team is surviving with room to add in some new talent. This isn’t nearly as big a loss for the Nugs as it’s made out to be. It’s the right move, perhaps just at the slightly wrong time

twitter.com/skitalicious
Quitter's People United Member #13

by runningdonut on Aug 5, 2010 1:15 AM MDT reply actions  

You hit it on the head about the Hunter trade

That’s why I have it included on my signature. I would love Wark someday to actually give an honest answer why the Hunter trade was done. If a fan takes off the Nugs hat and rainbow colored glasses for a moment and look at that deal objectively it was a bad bad bad bad deal and there’s no singular positive to take from it.

  • The Nugs needed to limit their tax exposure: BUT, the luxury tax isn’t calculated until after the season, not in August.
  • At the trade deadline, teams were desperate for expiring contracts… a team would’ve overpaid to get Hunter’s $3.7m.
  • The Nugs could’ve used Hunter’s contract and/or the 2010 1st round pick to upgrade their roster at or before the trade deadline when the Nugs were deperate for front line help… and this was before KMart’s injury.
  • The $3.7 TE the Nugs got back is far more resticting when you re-use it as opposed to a expiring contract (combine, 125% match, etc).
  • So the Nugs paid a team to take a valuable expiring contract that greatly impacted the team at the deadline and this summer’s draft.

Even then though, the Nugs not having any pieces for a deal before the trade deadline was a myth. The Nugs had tools; they chose not to or were unable to use them. Last year the Nugs let over $20m in tradable assets expire unused. Before the deadline, the Nugs had a $3.1m TE expire unused. At the deadline, the Nugs had the Hunter $3.7m TE go unused.

And I also fully expect the $3.7m TE to expire unused later this month. That means Wark burned a 1st round draft pick for nothing other than to take $3.7m off of the salary cap.

If Wark & Rex were ultimately fired due to job performance… these moves were just cause.

"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
"Remember the Alamo", "Remember the Maine", "Remember the Hunter Trade"
"Contenders commit to building a champion; pretenders end up getting bit right on their pick axe"

by the word on Aug 5, 2010 8:19 AM MDT up reply actions  

exactly... I guarantee we could've gotten David Lee or Jordan Hill(along with taking on Jefferies) for Hunter and our scrubs.... or someone like Beasley or Tyrus Thomas or John Salmons

But I get the feeling Stan told Wark, get rid of this guy at any means necessary … funny b/c we could’ve bought that first rounder back (Memphis sold it to Dallas)

by hvino on Aug 5, 2010 9:35 AM MDT up reply actions  

Not to mention Petro

In essence we traded chucky adkins and the 26th pick (taj Gibson) for petro and a 2nd rounder that we should have used on blair, but we sold it… we also cheaped out on petro by declining his team option and signing him to a 1 year min, which means he turned into a UFA. So instead of petro and blair, or taj gibson, we have… drumroll please… shelden williams. Hows that for diamond in the rough, asset management, lol.

by Monkfish on Aug 5, 2010 11:40 AM MDT up reply actions  

well in Wark/Stan/ CHap's fairness, no1 would have given Petro that QO

it was like almost $4 mil and we ended up re-signing him for $1 mil… so no mistake there

by hvino on Aug 5, 2010 2:11 PM MDT up reply actions  

More on the Hunter trade

I know you went over most of it, but it actually gets worse.

  • It was later revealed the Nugs also sent cash to Memphis in this deal. So, they basically paid most of it not all of Hunter’s salary for Memphis. All Memphis had to do was stash him on the roster, and the Nugs saved only a small luxury tax payment. Memphis acquired the pick for a very cheap price, and ended up later selling it to Dallas for a decent profit. If they got the full $3 million allowed from Mark Cuban (Likely) then it’s possible that Memphis doubled their money on the Hunter investment
  • Denver was rumored to have received Memphis’ second round pick in the deal. It was later revealed to be a conditional future second rounder, not necessarily Memphis’ own – and it’s possible Denver will end up seeing the pick at all
  • At the time of Hunter’s trade, the Nuggets had already given a qualifying offer to Kleiza, and they were in the process of trading 2 unguaranteed contracts to Milwaukee for Malik Allen’s guaranteed deal. Denver took on more money in that Malik Allen deal, due to a 2 for 1 trade creating another open roster spot that had to be filled – eventually by Joey Graham.

So, in summary – the argument that the Hunter trade saved Denver a ton of money is a myth. If they wanted to save money, they should have rescinded Kleiza’s qualifying offer (he left for nothing eventually) – or they should have nixed the Malik Allen trade and waived Sonny Weems and Walter Sharpe. Both of those moves would have provided equal or greater savings than the Hunter salary dump.

Honestly, the deal would have at least been somewhat palatable had Denver gotten a measly second round pick in 2010. They didn’t, and it cost them a chance at a player they coveted but couldn’t acquire the pick to get.

twitter.com/skitalicious
Quitter's People United Member #13

by runningdonut on Aug 6, 2010 6:24 AM MDT up reply actions  

wow

that is an ugly sequence of trades.

by Monkfish on Aug 6, 2010 10:49 AM MDT up reply actions  

For those who don't live in Denver, count yourself lucky you've only had to hear or read a small portion of Wark's comments

Proof of the pudding will be what does new FO do with Balkman who was definitly Wark’s folly. Normally a team shouldn’t need to worry about a $1.6m contract but for a team with a bloated payroll and an owner not really wanting to spend, that $1.6m is a big obstacle in trying to improve the team. And because it’s guaranteed for 3more years you can’t dump him and you can’t trade him because nobody else wants a bad 3year contract… even if it’s just for $1.6m… good move Wark.

Wark liked to play the ego card to the hilt, not answer questions and instead talk down to the interviewers & audience. The interviewers, possibly for concern that Wark wouldn’t come back for a future interview like the childish management practices they see the Rockies get away with, ofter took long pauses between comments and seldom questioned Wark’s on his non-comments. I always kept waiting for a response like “well you know us rubes here in Denver don’t know nthng but we have had a pro team for over 40years” and/or “I don’t seem to remember any of us who just fell off the turnip truck being responsible for the JailBlazers like you were”.

I tell you Wark is the poster child of someone who needs to be slapped on the back of the head by his grandma (because nobody ever messes with grandma) and be shaken back to reality with “Dude, glass houses”.

After enough time has passed and an objective comparison can be done, the last FO’s job performance I think will rate out a little better than Kiki’s time; but not by the leaps & bounds a lot of posters have been saying. Overall the bottom of the barrel signings & trades by Wark & Rex (Dahntay, AAA) may have been equal to Kiki’s (Najera, Bird the 1st time) but there might have been a few less misses (Tacos, Demar, Patterson).

"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
"Remember the Alamo", "Remember the Maine", "Remember the Hunter Trade"
"Contenders commit to building a champion; pretenders end up getting bit right on their pick axe"

by the word on Aug 5, 2010 8:03 AM MDT reply actions   1 recs

Food for thought

Does Stan open up the wallet and deal flexibility a bit with new FO?
I don’t think he will but if he does i guess that sends the message that he had lost confidence in the old FO spending money wisely. This was also the case with Kiki; but Wark & Rex were just given less rope to hang themselves with than Kiki had.

"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
"Remember the Alamo", "Remember the Maine", "Remember the Hunter Trade"
"Contenders commit to building a champion; pretenders end up getting bit right on their pick axe"

by the word on Aug 5, 2010 8:23 AM MDT up reply actions  

In Wark and Rex's defense, they were handed prob the worst pay roll in the league

overpaid players everywhere and first round exits… that said, certain things should have been handled differently (Camby, Hunter, Kleiza, the picks)…

by hvino on Aug 5, 2010 9:37 AM MDT up reply actions  

Anyone know when the interview process starts?

I would think within the next 2-3 days we’d get the first interviews and then like 3 final candidates all get 2nd interviews to determine who gets the job or if they hire 2 guys again (Sheppard and Ujiri or Griffin could make a dynamic duo)

by hvino on Aug 5, 2010 9:38 AM MDT reply actions  

Sad day....kind of

We’ve been over the full list of transactions engineered by the troika and I think we’ve pretty much all came to the agreement that there was more good than bad, but nothing got us over the top. Chapman and Wark had two years after dealing Camby to find a big man to battle the size in LA. They failed. They had a Kleiza for David Lee offer on the table and didn’t take it (thanks also in part to George Garl) now they lost Kleiza for nothing, which kind of means they lost David Lee for nothing. That to me is the biggest blemish on our former exec’s. I understand George Karl loved Kleiza and didn’t want to lose him but as an executive there comes a point where you have to pull the " I’m the boss" card and make a move that will help the team despite the coaches objections.

Obviously, the timing of this was poor. I would have liked to see a new gm earlier. Maybe the Nuggets weren’t sure what direction they were heading yet back in June, or maybe as Andrew speculated they were giving Rex and Wark this summer to get the big man job done. Either way, letting them go after the draft and fa and not getting a new gm to start building his plan with those tools is a mistake. I also question who exactly Stan and Son of Stan plan on getting who is better. I’m not an executive buff so I’ll stay out of the who’s next conversation.

One thing that is very concerning though: These firings, Karl’s health, Melo’s extension, the injuries to K-mart and Bird and the lack of a fourth big…Denver has question marks and nothing is certain from top to bottom.

Why live life on the edge, when you can jump off?
Quitter's People United Member #20

by Zachm219 on Aug 5, 2010 10:11 AM MDT reply actions  

+1 on the Lee trade

The more I think about it the more I take the same stance you mentioned about saying “I’m the boss.” As a GM you have to be confident in your abilities and you can’t let a coach override what you feel is the correct move. At the time that trade would have clearly given us the better deal, as David Lee was consistantly putting up double doubles. What’s the worst that would have happened, Karl would have been mad? Think of how much better we would be right now with Lee, especially considering our big man problems.

Stiff 4 Life

by GoldenNugget on Aug 5, 2010 4:30 PM MDT up reply actions  

Good read...

It was super interesting hearing about your meeting with Wark.

I have no idea why we’re considering anyone in the Wizard’s organization…I don’t recall seeing them make a good front office move. I agree that the choice should be Pritchard (guy has done an unbelievable job by all accounts, has credibility with the players since he played in the league, and understands both the value of observation and analytics). If that’s not possible, I feel like we should be looking to the Spurs, Thunder, or Rockets organizations for our next hire.

http://www.bluefirepoker.com/blog.aspx?blogid=68
twitter.com/chantech

by chantech on Aug 5, 2010 10:11 AM MDT reply actions  

Couldn't agree more... but that's why we should've fired them earlier

Teams obviously want to get GMs from good front offices that why Rich Cho (from OKC), Dale Demps (from SA) and a lot of these other no names have been hired over Ferry, Pritchard, Bower, Wark and etc….. teams have realized that GMs all start off as no names (except a few exceptions) so they’re trying to find the next RC Buford, or Sam Presti or Daryl Morey….

by hvino on Aug 5, 2010 10:30 AM MDT up reply actions  

Yeah, but the problem with the no name approach

is that for every RC, Presti, or Morey there is a Kahn or a Colenglo. Its fine for a rebuilding team, but for a 4 seed (borderline 2) it could be disastrous.

by Monkfish on Aug 5, 2010 11:47 AM MDT up reply actions  

We're not saying blindly hire a no name..

We’re saying hire a no name from a successful organization with the right skillset. What about Kahn would have led anyone to believe that he’d be successful in running a basketball organization?

Morey had an MIT pedigree, a business background, he had a track record of innovation, and some experience of working and rising quickly through another team’s front office. Likewise with Presti. These guys are almost universally considered stars (think Josh McDaniels in NE).

Your reference to Colangelo makes no sense. I would say he has had a successful career and was an innovator in his time.

http://www.bluefirepoker.com/blog.aspx?blogid=68
twitter.com/chantech

by chantech on Aug 5, 2010 12:04 PM MDT up reply actions  

haha cool story.

wish i was there to witness this run-in with wark.

let's go nuggets! who u wit?

by 808inDenver on Aug 5, 2010 10:38 AM MDT reply actions  

Ideal Candidates...

I think what we’re looking for is a guy from a quality organization, who has done great work behind the scenes, who not a whole lot of people have heard of. The best example of this is when the Thunder hired Presti away from the Spurs, at the time, the best organization in the league, and Presti was known to be a star in that organization. I’m not sure why we’d consider someone from organizations that haven’t been successful or have been known to make poor decisions.

I love what the Blazers did by hiring Rick Cho.

The ideal candidate would have these characteristics: in depth understanding of the cap (this is really important), fundamental understanding of basketball and coach speak (which is why it’s an advantage to have played basketball at least in college), scouting and player evaluation at both a college and the international level, negotiation skills, thorough understanding of the role of analytics, someone who understands how to build successful organizations and finally, someone who understands operations. If a lot of these skills sound like someone who is more suited for a CEO, that’s not a coincidence. I’m not sure if the politics of the NBA demands that the GM needs to be a former player to be taken seriously…but it feels like a lot of former players have been put in roles and they’re front men for smarter, more capable guys who are running the show behind the scenes.

Here are some names that I think would be interesting: Mike Zarren (guy behind the scenes who advises Ainge…although I’m not sure what the hell they’re doing signing Shaq), Haralabos Voulgaris (aloneinthecorner.com) who has done some of the most profound and analytical analysis I’ve seen, Sam Hinkie (VP of Operations with the Rockets), Demps would have been a great option, Jeff Weltner from the Bucks (Scott Skiles was a brilliant coaching hire, they’ve made some very shrewd moves in the past couple years).

While I think Reilly in Miami did a masterful job, there’s tons of other GMs with the forethought to clear a ton of space to land the big 3. He was the only one who got lucky and landed them…so he looks like a genius. The key word there is luck. He has done a great job of building a team around the big 3, but at the same time, it’s not hard to recruit to play with LeBron, DWade and Bosh. The smarter GMs are the ones who didn’t panic sign Amare Stoudemire or Joe Johnson to big deals. They’re saving their cap space.

http://www.bluefirepoker.com/blog.aspx?blogid=68
twitter.com/chantech

by chantech on Aug 5, 2010 11:58 AM MDT reply actions  

Should add Tom Penn to that list... he was Pritch's assistant and supposedly is responsible for a lot their collection of cheap asset (Which they turn into young talent)

Funny cuz the Nuggets could theoretically hire Portland’s two main FO for the past few years in Penn and Pritchard… they’re a great combo and I would love them together again in Denver (Penn is the brains with the cap knowledge and shrewd trades, while Pritch is the talent evaluator and draft genius)

One thing that scares me is that when Portland got under the cap, Pritch couldn’t get a good FA… almost gave Turkoglu the contract Toronto gave him, almost got a steal in Milsap (but was matched) then settled for Miller

by hvino on Aug 5, 2010 2:09 PM MDT up reply actions  

Some more good candidates

(Just speculating)
Dennis Lindsey from the Spurs, before that with Houston (turned down the Suns job, so I don’t know how available he is)
Ronnie Lester from the Lakers (Kupchak’s right hand man)
Both played, have extensive scouting experience, and come from successful organizations. .

by asdqqq on Aug 5, 2010 9:06 PM MDT up reply actions  

via Hoopshype twitter section:
Michael Cunningham: #Hawks asst GM Dave Pendergraft has emerged as early candidate for #Nuggets GM. He’s also in mix for #Suns GM Over 8 hours ago.

Read more: http://hoopshype.com/twitter_media.html#ixzz0vmaaClaa

idk who he is, but I would rahter get someone who is well known or comes from a good organization/ well mentored…

by hvino on Aug 5, 2010 6:54 PM MDT reply actions  

I looked him up... I think he recently joined the hawks

I think he has his roots from the Sonic (maybe from Karl’s era?) so maybe Karl is pushing for him… I still stand by my preference in the first comment (experience or well mentored/ good org.)

by hvino on Aug 5, 2010 6:56 PM MDT up reply actions  

rex and wark know the drill better then anybody

i was at the pepsi center the day jawon howard was let go. they both knew how the organization worked for several years. they had valid contracts and knew the consequences of when they expired. what goes around comes around. the organization is in transition with josh kroenke moving into the ownership role. making big money managing a pro basketball team. rex and wark have been truely blessed. these are the last 2 guys on earth i feel sorry for.

pick up a calf every day pretty soon you will be picking up a cow
we're on a mission from god

by nohoops4u on Aug 5, 2010 10:24 PM MDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Proprietors
Andrew Feinstein
(denverstiffs@gmail.com)
Nate Timmons
(ntimmons73@yahoo.com)

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Fire George Karl, please!!!!
442_small
Masai Ujiri - GM of the Year

Recent FanPosts

Crest_small
Laker beat Nuggets THREAD
Surfboardcopy2_small
Lakers v Nuggets 2nd half thread
Broncos_stadium-9115_small
Wilson Chandler coming back long-term?
Small
Does Denver actually have depth?
Newtromneylol_small
half price Nuggets tickets
Small
George Karl's blunder
Small
Hypothetical trade that gets us a center (but still won't happen)
Nba_denver_nuggets_logo_small
The Nuggies need a late game general!!!
Fat_lever_small
Not Sold on the Nuggets Yet

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

STIFF LIST (as of 1/30 by Jeff Morton)

1. THE ORLANDO MAGIC
After starting the season so well with the Dwight Howard trade drama (10-3) - the Magic have fallen apart (2-5 since) with embarrassing losses to the Celtics (twice), Hornets, and Pacers. Trade Dwight already!

2. CHAUNCEY BILLUPS' FLOP VS. NUGGETS
In the waning seconds of Sunday's game against the Clippers, Chauncey pulled off an acting performance so good it deserved an Academy Award. If he was still a Nugget we would love it, but he's not. STIFF!

3. JIMMER FREDETTE
Dude, if you are going to take the game-winning shot, at least draw some iron: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNO1goJOruQ

4. GEORGE KARL'S 4TH QUARTER AGAINST THE CLIPPERS
Getting out coached by Vinny Del Negro should be a nice wake-up call. Going away from Gallo. Leaving Al Harrington in. Using Rudy Fernandez at point guard. And going ultra small contributed to the Nuggets loss.

5. JEFF MORTON
For saying that the Nuggets would skimp on payroll and go cheap like the Avalanche. Clearly I was wrong and deserve to be on this Stiff List. I can only hope that the gods of basketball forgive me.

DENVER STIFFS ON FACEBOOK

Enter your email for updates

Email:

Denver Stiffs on Twitter

DENVER STIFFS HALL OF FAME

2010 INDUCTION CLASS

F - Raef LaFrentz
F - Mark Pope
C - Priest Lauderdale
G - DerMarr Johnson
G - Darnell Mee
L.A. - Bernie Bickerstaff

2009 INDUCTION CLASS

F - Bill Hanzlik
F - Ryan Bowen
C - Danny Schayes
G - Julius Hodge
G - Junior Harrington

2008 INDUCTION CLASS

F - Nikoloz Tskitishvili
F - Joe Wolf
F - Tony Battie
C - Scott Hastings
G - Tariq Abdul-Wahad
G - Mark Macon


Proprietors

304196_2551840719324_1353064703_32974236_1387484886_n_small Nate Timmons

Dsc00033_small Andrew Feinstein

Writer

Me_oh_my_oh_small Jeffrey Morton