Renaldo Balkman 2008-09 exit interview
by Nate Timmons on Jun 9, 2009 2:52 PM MDT
in News and Opinion
6 comments
Rounding out the small forwards on the Nuggets roster is Renaldo Balkman aka Kook aka The Crime Stopper. Balkman never had a clearly defined role with the Nuggets last season and was thrust into the lineup very sporadically. The Nuggets must decide who is best equipped to backup Carmelo Anthony next season and Balkman will make his case for that role.
Follow the jump to read more about Renaldo Balkman's role with the team in the upcoming 2009-10 season ...
Renaldo Balkman: 6'8'' 210 lbs. Will turn 25 on July 14, 2009
Contract status: Under contract for next season for $2.03 million ... the following season (2010-11) Balkman is scheduled to become a restricted free agent if Denver extends him the $2.9 million qualifying offer.
Overview of 2008-09 season: It was very difficult to see what Balkman could do over the entire season because he only appeared in 53 games (starting 10 of those). He was never fully in George Karl's rotation, but did provide the Nuggets with some quality starts in place of injured Kenyon Martin.
Averaged 14.7 minutes a game … has only averaged 15 mpg for his career.
Shooting:
FG: 55.8% (career high)
FT: 64.6% (53.6% career)
Rebounds: 3.8 per game ... 2.2 defensive and 1.6 offensive (3.8 rpg over his career)
Scoring: 5.0 ppg (4.4 career and 3.4 last season in 65 games with the Knicks)
Positive / What he brings: It appears to me that 'Naldo is the consummate teammate. His teammates enjoy having him around and when he had good games there was never a shortage of positive postgame chatter from his teammates. Balkman has an elaborate and goofy tipoff ritual where he gives each teammate a greeting, greets press row, and concludes things with a chest bump with J.R. Smith or Sonny Weems. His long dreadlocks and sleepy face invite the fans to make him a crowd favorite, but more than anything his leg tattoos "Hustle Harder" embody the type of player he is. Balkman is the modern day Dennis Rodman in my view. The guy is a pest the entire length of the floor. He'll try to bother the ball in the backcourt, he fronts entry passes in the post, goes for steals on entry passes into the post with regularity, glues himself to his man, and is always going to the glass on shot attempts on both sides of the floor.
Balkman recorded 15+ minutes of playing time in 26 games in the 2008-09 season with Denver and the Nuggets went 21-5 in those contests.
Balkman's stats in those 26 games:22.15 minutes
93-152 on field goal attempts ... good for 61% shooting (3.6 - 5.8 shooting per game)
8.4 points
6.4 rebounds (2.6 offensive / 3.73 defensive)
What are we to make of these 26 games? Was it just a flash in the pan type of thing or are fans correct in thinking that when Balkman plays that good things happen? I'm sort of in the latter part of this question. When you have a guy on the floor giving his all I think more good is going to happen than not. The addition of Balkman made sense when Denver lost Eduardo Najera to the New Jersey Nets (27 games and 2.9 points for Eddie last season by the way), but the way George Karl yanked around his playing time confused me as much as the horrible ending of Will Smith's I Am Legend (don't get me started).
What 'Naldo lacks in talent he more than makes up for in heart.
Negative / What needs to improve: I want to know why Balkman didn't see the rotation more and I don't buy it was because he didn't have a full training camp in Denver or that he occationally lets in an open layup. I did hear some rumors that Balkman missed quite a few practices, but can't find anything about it in the land of the internet. The fact remains that Denver had a 21-5 record in games where Balkman played 15+ minutes ... so he must be doing something right.
Balkman does lack the ability to create his own shot and his jumper isn't the most consistent thing around, but he doesn't even bother looking for it (outside of garbage time) because he knows his role. Balkman showed he has the ability to finish around the rim, but his lack of size in the paint has been a bit of an issue as he'll blow a layup or get a shot blocked from time-to-time as he plays the game with a 7-footers mentality. I don't think there is a ton of upside left with Balkman as he'll be 25 years-old next month, but that's not to say he can't improve his jumper a bit, improve his ball handling, and get more comfortable in Denver's system.
Outlook for 2009-10 season: I read somewhere in the blogosphere that Denver fans only root for Balkman because he's sort of a character. I don't think this is true at all. Again, it's easy to support a guy who is out there giving a tremendous effort and actually having an effect on the game.
There has been a lot of talk on this blog and elsewhere about Balkman perhaps being ready and able to take over Linas Kleiza's role as Carmelo Anthony's backup should LK not be back with the team next season. LK and Balkman couldn't be more different. LK the offensive minded forward with shooting range and Balkman the hustling player who creates his offense on the offensive glass and works hard on defense.
Should the Nuggets hand the backup duties to Balkman? As much as I appreciate Renaldo's game I don't quite see him being an upgrade for the Nuggets. It's funny how I'll ask why he didn't get more playing time and then all the sudden say he isn't the answer to backup Melo, but this team is gunning for a championship and cannot afford to take a big gamble by giving Balkman all the backup duties behind Melo.
Balkman represents yet another Nuggets player who offers one great thing (hustle), but lacks a complete game. I know role players are just that because they are typically flawed, but it sure does seem like Denver has a lot of one trick ponies. The best thing the Nuggets could do is to get the NBA to allow hockey-like subsitutions on the fly so that Balkman could enter the game for LK on every defensive possession. Seeing as how I'm more likely to win Powerball than to see those type of baseless rules get incorporated into the League ... the Nuggets must either retain LK or bring somebody in to offer some competition for Balkman as Carmelo's backup.
0 recs |
6 comments
|
Email
Print
Comments
He is a quality player.
When Isiah drafted him so high, I, as many others were quite skeptical. I didn’t think he’d last more than two seasons in the L.
After watching him a fair amount this season, I really admire his game. There’s no doubt he’s an offensive liability. He cannot create his own shot, doesn’t have much (any) range, no speed, but he’s not delusional about it, which is a positive. He’s doesn’t try to do anything he’s not capable of. He can be effective in pick-and-role situations.
One of his positives is that he’ll give you all he’s got every minute he’s out on that court, no matter the time or score. He’s also athletic for his size, and has a great knack for the ball. Crashing the boards is truly his best quality, especially on the offensive end. He gets a ton of second-chance garbage points.
With all that said, I can’t say I’d feel comfortable with him as a primary back-up; nor do I ever think he will develop his offensive game enough to be a primary bench player. Throughout his career he’s going to be the 10th, 11th or 12th man off the bench. He’ll make a career simply off of playing hard, and hey, there’s absolutely nothing wrong with that; it makes me a fan of his.
by NuggetsFan99 on Jun 9, 2009 7:41 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Agree completely
I have no doubt Naldo could come in and compete for backup SF role immediately. Love his energy and the fact he plays within himself, getting his points off broken plays and hustle. I’m not comfortable with him in a primary backup role without adding some more scoring punch to the bench. If we bring back Dahntay and (God forbid) AC then having Birdman, Naldo and a bunch of offensive liabilities on the bench could hurt this team. I’m afraid the defense will collapse on Melo, Chauncey, JR and we go into long scoring droughts without someone else to create offense.
I still would like to see Balkman get more time though, I think he could be a gritty defensive stopper similar to Dahntay’s role if we end up not keeping DJ.
by runningdonut on Jun 10, 2009 7:32 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
As much as people don’t think Balkman can play back up to Anthony, I feel if we do a sign and trade of Kleiza for a backup point guard, it would probably be more useful than keeping him. The reason i say this is because Melo is probably gonna eat up almost 40 minutes a game, and Balkman really isn’t that bad. Billups is getting old, so I wouldn’t mind bringing in a young point guard to learn from him, and spell him (to keep him fresh in the playoffs). Hence at this point I can’t see any other nugget being traded that has value.
by bodmiesta on Jun 10, 2009 12:41 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
YA
"Some people want it to happen, some wish it would happen, others make it happen"
~ Michael Jordan
by ChiBullsFan on Jun 11, 2009 9:09 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Balkman's playing time
According to a source…Karl said (off the record) that Kool did something far worst than what Melo did when he refused to leave the floor. Didn’t elaborate what it was, but Balkman was late to practice a couple times during the preseason. Also Karl was worried about Kleiza’s mentally and how he would react to his minutes being reduced. But this was during the time Kleiza was struggling.
by Jonnbear on Jun 13, 2009 5:49 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Any sort of link to said off the record comments?
Pickaxe & Roll.com: 5,280 reasons to be a Nuggets fan
by Nate Timmons on Jun 15, 2009 8:56 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
Related FanPosts on Denver Stiffs
Related FanShots on Denver Stiffs
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recommended FanPosts
Recent FanPosts
DENVER STIFFS T-SHIRTS!
Enter your email for updates
Certain photos copyright © 2010 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
