Linas Kleiza 2008-09 exit interview
Well, we’ve covered the Nuggets’ starter at small forward with Carmelo Anthony. Sticking with this position … let’s go over the incumbent backup: Linas Kleiza.
Full breakdown on L.K. after the jump.
Linas Kleiza: 6’8’’ 245 lbs. Will turn 25 in January 2010.
Contract status: Will become a Restricted Free-Agent after the Nuggets offer LK his $2.7 million qualifying offer. Nuggets can negotiate a contract with Kleiza and will have 7 days to match any offer he signs with another team (unless he signs with a European team … but if that happens Denver retains his rights when/if he rejoins the NBA.)
Overview of 2008-09 season: The best word that describes LK: tantalizing … or maybe frustrating … definitely inconsistent … LK’s game changes like the Colorado weather (and that’s not a good thing … we just had a 55 degree day filled with rain sandwiched in-between two beautiful 70 degree days.)
Averaged 22.2 minutes a game … played in a career-high 82 games and started 7 of those contests. Minutes dipped slightly from 23.9 mpg last season.
Shooting:
FG: 44.7% (47.2% last season)
FT: 72.5% (76.5% career)
3-pt: 32.6% (34.2% career) Kleiza made 87-267 threes this season compared to 94-277 last season. Not a major drop off in my opinion, but also no improvement (obviously.)
Rebounds: 4 per game (3.5 career and 4.3 last season)
Scoring: 9.9 ppg (8.3 career and 11.1 last season)

Where will LK shoot rock next season?
Positives / What he brings: LK will start the 2009-10 campaign at just 24 years-old. He’ll be entering just his 5th season in the NBA next year and still has a lot of upside. Kleiza is a scoring threat off the bench and a fearless one. Linas showed major guts in Game 6 when he appeared to be the only player aside from J.R. Smith willing to shoot the ball and take it to the rack. His mixture of size and shooting range poses a lot of problems for teams. Kleiza is pretty quick off his drives and loves to get out and run. LK would be a perfect player for the New York Knicks’ Mike D’Antoni. He likes to shoot rock the three pointer and can finish on the fastbreak, which is exactly what D’Antoni’s system is built for.
Some interesting stats on LK from this past season:
- When LK scored in double-figures the Nuggets were 26-13 and 4-2 in the playoffs.
- When LK recorded 6+ rebounds the Nuggets were 13-6 and 1-1 in the playoffs.
- When LK recorded double-figures scoring and 6+ rebounds the Nuggets were: 9-3 and 1-0 in the playoffs.
Negatives / What needs to improve: When I looked over the numbers above, the thing that jumped out most to me was that Kleiza only produced 12 total regular season games where he scored double-figures and recorded 6+ rebounds and the guy was averaging 22 minutes a game and played in all 82 contests.
Kleiza has yet to develop a mid-range game or shown the ability to finish with his left hand off drives (or go left when driving the ball.) This has to change in order for LK to make a breakthrough as a real scoring threat in the League. I am not ready to say that Kleiza regressed last season, but I’m more than willing to say he treaded water and at just 24 years-old he can’t afford to get by on "promise" and "upside" for much longer.
Kleiza is another guy that has too much shooting range to shoot so poorly from the foul line … a C- is not going to cut it from the charity stripe. When LK gets the ball on offense it seems that his first, second, and third options are to score the ball and that has got to change. Not all players are gifted passers, but there must be some effort made by Linas to create some opportunities for his teammates. The guy averages 0.07 assists in his career and just 0.08 last season. Not everyone has to be a point guard, but adding a touch of diversity to your offensive game will only make you more dangerous when the ball is in your hands.
Defensively: Kleiza is sort of stuck between a rock and a hard place. He’s not laterally sound and has trouble staying in front of quicker forwards. You don’t necessarily have to be quick to guard guys … just ask Larry Bird. Kleiza needs to learn how to take angles better so he’s not forced to reach and commit cheap fouls. Time and again when he guards guys coming off screens he wont fight through and gets burned for easy buckets when he goes around screens near the hoop. Defense can be improved through effort and I’d love to see more effort out of LK in his all around game.
Outlook for 2009-10 season: I don’t know what team Kleiza is going to end up playing for next season. I do know that rumors surfaced that Denver was close to dealing LK to the Knicks during the season for David Lee and those rumors were said to have been squashed by George Karl himself. Having the coach on your side is never a bad thing, especially since the coach and owner have a good relationship. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Denver retain LK and I wouldn’t be surprised if another team came in and offered Kleiza enough money to scare Denver off.
Look, Denver is going to pay the luxury tax next season no matter what they do. It’s all a matter of how much Stan Kroenke is willing to pay. Remember … for every dollar spent over the cap you must match … so if you are $4 million over you must match the $4 million and pay $8 million.
I don’t think Kleiza’s situation comes down to strictly money issues … I think his situation depends more on if the coaching staff thinks Kleiza has reached his ceiling as a player. The best thing probably for both parties would be for LK to sign the qualifying offer (one-year $2.7 million), which would allow Linas to become an un-restricted free agent next season. But with a potential lockout looming over the league in a couple of seasons … it’d be in the best interest of the players to take whatever deals they can get to try to secure their future.
As far as my take goes … I think it’d be very difficult to watch a 24 year-old four year player walk away without getting anything in return (see Mutombo, Dikembe). The Nuggets might be able to use LK in a sign-and-trade deal if such an option presented itself, as Kleiza is Denver’s biggest wild card. I can’t decide if what we’ve seen out of LK is what we are going to get from here out. His tantalizing skill set still draws me in, so it’s somewhat obvious that I’d feel bittersweet about letting Linas go. I’m just glad I’m not the one making this seemingly crucial decision.
0 recs |
18 comments
|
Comments
I can’t figure LK out. Just when I’ve lost total confidence in him he seems to throw down his ‘once in a blue moon’ huge game. I really liked LK coming into this season; however, his tendency to be a non-factor for long stretches and defensive struggles makes me think we need to go after a more consistent all-around contributor.
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
by PosterNutbag on Jun 5, 2009 5:03 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree with that assessment, I would like someone who is better on the defensive end
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman
by Broncoman on Jun 8, 2009 6:27 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't make him a top priority...
I honestly feel that Kleiza has reached his poential; which is the option I voted for in the poll.
I wouldn’t be opposed to him returning, but if another franchise is willing to overpay (as I’m sure somebody will be), the Nuggets should just let him go.
He once showed much promise, but has yet to really improve or expand his game over the past few seasons.
If the Nuggets can get him back at a decent price, then I’m not opposed. I just hope if they do decide to bring him back it doesn’t affect the re-signing of Chris Andersen or an upgrade at the guard or center position.
by NuggetsFan99 on Jun 5, 2009 5:33 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Frankly
I don’t think Kleiza is really worth it. He can shoot the three ball…sometimes. What else can he do? Not much. Too much work for someone I believe is really just a scrub. I wouldn’t sign him back if I were in the front office.
J.R. is my homeboy
by Greyson on Jun 5, 2009 8:54 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Actually, let me rescind part of that. I don’t think he’s just a scrub, per se, but I just don’t think he really has all that much potential and I don’t see him having a great future on this team.
J.R. is my homeboy
by Greyson on Jun 5, 2009 8:59 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
The question is
does LK fit in with the new look defense-first philosophy? It might be too early to say, but didn’t make a strong case for himself last season. This isn’t the old team, and we shouldn’t be looking for him to come off the bench and score 25 for him to be valuable asset. If he could contribute some defense and rebounding it would be a little easier to deal with his inconsistent offense. The other thing is, I feel Kleiza is a ball-stopper. When he gets the ball, he’s rarely in a position to make a play for someone else, which results in a shot or a kick out to someone else who will make a play. Kleiza is good in transition but he doesn’t use his frame enough to get rebounds, which limits his effectiveness in the half court. And 32% three point shooting is just not good enough for the amount of 3s he attempts. He’s 24, and all of those things could improve with team, but I don’t know if he has the tools to ever be the kind of reliable defender we need.
Kleiza could have been traded back when he had a lot more value, but wasn’t. For that I do think GK and the Nugs want him to have a future with the team. The money situation right now makes it hard to justify signing him, which is why he didn’t get the extension last year. If he stays, LK needs to motivate himself to earn a good contract next season. If JR starts, then LK should have a great opportunity to break out and a consistent role which might have been lacking last season. If he goes, I’ll be bummed that he couldn’t realize his potential here but I wouldn’t fault the team for that, because he’s had a chance to develop.
by runningdonut on Jun 5, 2009 11:29 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
I like this analysis!
Really couldn’t agree more on the points you make.
Pickaxe & Roll.com: 5,280 reasons to be a Nuggets fan
by Nate Timmons on Jun 6, 2009 1:59 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Very well put!
I like the way you think; great points brought up!
by NuggetsFan99 on Jun 7, 2009 1:10 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kleiza is such a question mark ... he's the most gray area Nuggets player that I can remember in years.
Pickaxe & Roll.com: 5,280 reasons to be a Nuggets fan
by Nate Timmons on Jun 6, 2009 2:00 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
By gray area I mean: Usually you know if you want a guy back or not and with LK ... I just can't decide.
But like Runningdonut says … he’s has so many chances to develop more with the Nuggets that you can’t fault the front office if they let him walk.
Pickaxe & Roll.com: 5,280 reasons to be a Nuggets fan
by Nate Timmons on Jun 6, 2009 2:00 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Keep Him!
I think this off year was probably a result from playing in the Olympics. This summer should be a feel good positive on for the whole Nuggets team. They all now (With Billups and Kmart as the exception) have a taste of what real success is like and have all summer to go over what happened and what they can do to improve.
by CombatChuk on Jun 6, 2009 8:46 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
As a fan
it’s easy to root for keeping LK because I think he was a good pick for us that had a bad year of no growth in his individual game. But he is a good backup 3 and in that Lakers series he was the 2nd or third most consistant guy for us. What’s crazy is despite disappointment all season I was actually rooting for him to get the ball more in the Lakers series. That tells me that he should be able to get better enough to where he can carve out a steady role for himself.
I have no idea what kind of contract Kleiza is worth right now, so I think the Nugs have to offer him a modest deal at the qualifying offer and see what happens. It’s probably unlikely that he would accept a one year deal though. I think the Nugs are at a crossroads with him and should explore what he can bring back via sign and trade versus keeping him. Obviously, first things first and that is Birdman. But moving on, if you could keep only one between Dahntay and LK who would it be? After thinking about ti for a while I can say that for me, it’s Linas.
by runningdonut on Jun 6, 2009 10:17 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
i feel like denver should try to sign and trade him for a young back up point guard like maybe jerryd bayless or someone who gets drafted. as good as chauncey is, i think he’s getting a little old, and it wouldn’t hurt to add a young point guard to learn from chauncey. plus, i honestly don’t think that ac is good even as a backup.
i feel like doing a sign and trade of kleiza you could also open the doors for balkman to play as the backup small forward, and i think the nuggets won’t miss that much and add a decent pg (at least as a backup).
by bodmiesta on Jun 7, 2009 11:01 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I like LK on a personnel level, but I really don't see how he fits being a backup SF
Granted he can have some amazing games, but he seems to lack any consistancy and looks like he wants or needs to be a starter, and he is definately a defensive liability most nights, I could see a trade with Portland or another team say for Travis Outlaw or some other SF, but I rather get a bigger PF/C in the deal. I am not opposed to resigning him, but no big contracts. He may be more valuable as trade bait next year versus anything else, if we could trade him to the Lakers for say Odom, I would be all for that.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman
by Broncoman on Jun 8, 2009 6:32 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Or trade him for Trevor Ariza also, but I doubt that would happen.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman
by Broncoman on Jun 8, 2009 6:33 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
There's no way...
There’s absolutely no chance of the Lakers giving up Ariza or Odom, or the Blazers giving up Outlaw for Kleiza.
by NuggetsFan99 on Jun 9, 2009 1:44 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Keep for Cheap
I think Kleiza is worth keeping barring the right scenario. Given that he is only 24, I think he still has sizeable, attainable upside. He is a good enough shooter that his percentages will rise over time. I would also like to know what his ‘garbage’ time shooting percentage is; I notice he would get trigger happy in those minutes during the regular season, which may or may not skew his percentages. Overall, he has proven to be a decent scorer / ok rebounder, and I don’t think he is as big a liability on defense as people may think, as long as his minutes come of the bench. He provides the team with durability, scoring, outside shooting, and free throw shooting. If he ever develops into a capable playmaker, he will be a starter in this league.
by Kleiza's Corner on Jun 9, 2009 12:35 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree with runningdonut… In the Laker’s series, LK was one of the most consistent players for us. I also think with a summer to think about what happened, and not playing in the Olympics, he should improve his game for us. I vote – Keep for Cheap
by DenverNative on Jun 9, 2009 11:43 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs

by 













