Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: 2012 NBA All-Star Game Starters Announced

Unacceptable... (Nuggets/T'Wolves recap)

71013_timberwolves_nuggets_basketball_medium_mediumThere are good losses, bad losses and unacceptable losses.  This one falls squarely in the "unacceptable" column.

Star-divide

Call me the Nuggets Curmudgeon from now on, because I've had it with the way this team is playing.  Going back to the Nuggets no-show performance against the Heat in Miami at the beginning of the month, the Nuggets nasty habit of waltzing through games against lesser competition finally bit them in the ass tonight.  Could this be the wake up call the Nuggets needed moving forward?  Or was tonight's unacceptable (I'll get to why it's unacceptable in a moment) loss to the god awful Timberwolves be the continuation of a pattern that we'll be seeing all season long?

Sitting at 12-5, in theory there shouldn't be much to complain about.  In theory.  But among those 17 games played, only five - home against Utah and the Lakers, on the road against Portland, Miami and Atlanta - were against teams that actually scare anyone in the NBA, and including Miami in that fivesome is a stretch.  While the Nuggets have been cursed with a league high 22 back-to-backs, they were also given a blessing by getting 13 weak opponents out of their first 18 games (Golden State being the 13th weak opponent...coming into Pepsi Center on Tuesday).

But rather than take advantage of these circumstances and pad the win column early as they did admirably last season, the Nuggets have pissed away two should've/could've/gift wrapped victories (at the Clippers last week against an injury-depleted Clips squad and tonight against the lowly Wolves) and almost gave away a third to the Knicks on Friday night. 

Before everyone says I'm being too negative, allow me to explain the difference between a good loss, a bad loss and an unacceptable loss.  

When the Nuggets lost to the Bucks in Milwaukee, I'd call that a good loss.  The Nuggets were wrapping up a tough road trip that included three pairs of back-to-back games, and even though the Bucks were the more energized team the Nuggets dug deep and put up a fight through the very end of the game.

When the Nuggets lost to the injury-rattled Clippers in Los Angeles last week, that was a bad loss.  The Nuggets had been off for two days, had played only twice in eight days (both at home) prior to that game and both those games were walkover, no-energy-needed contests.  But they were on the road and anything can happen on the road.

Tonight's game falls into the nether regions known as an unacceptable loss.  Entering tonight's contest, the Nuggets had a day off, last played at home and, oh yeah, the Wolves were 1-and-fucking-15 before tonight!  All the Nuggets had to do was watch game tape of their easy victory against the Wolves in Minneapolis last week to further exploit the Wolves myriad problems, pound the ball inside and play halfway decent defense.

So who were the culprits for tonight's embarrassing home defeat?  In no particular order, allow me...

...head coach George Karl, for waiting until the five or so minute mark remaining in the game to demand that his team start playing harder and turn up the pressure on the Wolves (according to Altitude's Maya Starks).

...Carmelo Anthony, for continuing his El Matador-style defense for the second game in a row turning Ryan Gomes into an All-Star while getting to the free throw line for a mere five attempts.  Five attempts?!!

...Chauncey Billups, for continually chucking three's even though he made just 25% of them tonight and finished a ghastly 2-13 overall (and yes, I had claimed Chauncey's shot was back after the Knicks game...shows you what I know).

...J.R. Smith for playing defense so erratically, I thought he might take out all his teammates on several possessions like a bowling ball crashing into the pins.

...Ty Lawson for being so careless with the ball, I thought Anthony Carter had suddenly reemerged as the backup point guard.

...Chris Andersen for remaining grounded as teams take it right at him inside with no fear whatsoever.  Three @#$%& rebounds?  Three?!!

Ok.  Deep breath.  My venting is over (for now).  I still have the utmost confidence that this Nuggets team can make noise when it counts.  But when they finish one game behind Portland or Dallas for homecourt advantage in the second round of the playoffs (forget the Nuggets catching the Lakers by season's end, that ain't happening) remember this loss.  This unacceptable, unwarranted, inexcusable, horrible loss.

Photo courtesy of AP: David Zalubowski

Comment 104 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

stupid loss

the IQ of this team has plummeted to special olympics levels.

while the players are playing poorly, i blame Karl for the poor preparation and motivation.

KARL MUST GO!

by Alan_775 on Nov 29, 2009 9:13 PM MST reply actions  

karl must go?

Maya Starks said that during the timeout Karl told the team to take it to the basket and quit with the jump shots. So what happens? The first thing J.R. does is shoot a 3. How many 3’s did Chauncy put up? It ain’t Karl’s fault.

by spokenwar on Nov 30, 2009 7:47 AM MST up reply actions  

You live in denial

I’m a JR fan however if he took a bad shot then I would have yanked him.
It is Karl’s fault. He knows how his team is playing yet he takes no action to correct them.
Why would you take Melo and CB1 out and just leave them sitting. Have you ever heard of rhythm GK?
Loses like this is why Stan K won’t pay to get a big man. GK has the talent and can’t lead his team to beat a sub five hundred team at the Pepsi Center.

by samdman on Nov 30, 2009 8:57 AM MST up reply actions  

Thank goodness

I’m glad I didn’t watch this game. Hopefully Melo gets more motivated on defense, and the frontline can toughen up a little.

"Those guys were the suckiest bunch of sucks that ever sucked" - Homer defines the Bears '09 season in less than 12 words.

by propheteer on Nov 29, 2009 9:25 PM MST reply actions  

I watched the second half of the first quarter and the second quarter before I had to leave for a while

When I got back in the middle of the third, I chucked my remote at my TV (but thankfully/purposefully missed). When I checked the score with 25 seconds remaining Nuggets down 6 I gave up, banged my head on my wall, and nearly tore my Chauncey jersey

"Left hand, right hand, it doesn't matter. I'm amphibious." - Charles Shackleford
"If the NBA were on channel 5 and a bunch of frogs making love were on channel 4, I'd watch the frogs, even if they were coming in fuzzy." - Bobby Knight
"We have a great bunch of outside shooters. Unfortunately, all our games are played indoors." - Weldon Drew

by LACK on Nov 29, 2009 9:46 PM MST up reply actions  

Sickening Loss

Definitely unacceptable loss. I mean they had a chance to really get a hold on their division with Portland dropping an unacceptable loss to Memphis on Friday. It was already hard to stay with the Lakers for top seed but now it looks like it will be hard to compete with the Suns, Mavericks, Blazers, and even Spurs. You know that the Thunder are much better too. This was a loss they puts more pressure on everything for them. At the same time, the season is early and the Nuggets can still do it!

by Buffalo Bills Forever! on Nov 29, 2009 9:29 PM MST reply actions  

Dito on the Thunder

They aren’t the push overs that some critic think they are.
Scott Brooks is bringing them on.

by samdman on Nov 30, 2009 9:07 AM MST up reply actions  

The Thunder are doing good

I’d swap players with them…or swap coaches.

"Left hand, right hand, it doesn't matter. I'm amphibious." - Charles Shackleford
"If the NBA were on channel 5 and a bunch of frogs making love were on channel 4, I'd watch the frogs, even if they were coming in fuzzy." - Bobby Knight
"We have a great bunch of outside shooters. Unfortunately, all our games are played indoors." - Weldon Drew

by LACK on Nov 30, 2009 4:23 PM MST up reply actions  

The Andrew game recap curse lives on.

by cessair on Nov 29, 2009 9:36 PM MST reply actions  

True

Can Nate do the Post-Game, and Andrew stick with in-depth analysis?

by CSprings_Tommy on Nov 30, 2009 8:00 AM MST up reply actions  

it is on the starters

14 point lead at half time and score 12 points in the third quarter. after the t-wolves 10-0 run to start the second half coach karl should have pulled all 5 starters. nene should become a magician instead of a basketball player. 1st quarter- 5 points, 4 rebounds and 3 assists. 2nd quarter- 4 points, 2 rebounds and 1 assist. 3rd quarter- 1 assist. 4th quarter- 1 point, and 3 rebounds. that is a disappearing act. there are 2 bad habits denver has from last season that continue into this season. nuggets get off to a bad start AND OR they get a lead and let the opponent back into the game. both habits are the result of poor execution in the half court offense.

pick up a calf every day pretty soon you will be picking up a cow

by nohoops4u on Nov 29, 2009 9:49 PM MST reply actions  

You fail to mention

that Nene was the only one in the 4th playing hard defense. Came up with at least two HUGE blocks and a rebound on about the only 3 stops we had in the last 10 minutes. Nene wasn’t spectacular, but this loss does not fall on him. Try any of the 6 other people that Andrew mentioned. I agree with about everything he said.

by ZTC_87 on Nov 29, 2009 10:08 PM MST up reply actions  

you need to take a remedial reading class

the title of my post was IT IS ON THE STARTERS. maybe you fail to mention there are 5 starters on a basketball team. you also fail to mention that nene’s 2 huge blocks were the result of him being beat in the first place and being out of position. as i stated the loss is on the starters- nene included. 2 blocks and a rebound in the fourth quarter NEVER makes up for ONE ASSIST in the 3rd quarter. stating that nene should be a magician and has a disappearing act is not putting the loss on him alone. there is no way you can objectively mention 6 other people with out including nene. check the box score while you are at it.

pick up a calf every day pretty soon you will be picking up a cow

by nohoops4u on Nov 29, 2009 10:42 PM MST up reply actions  

Maybe YOU should check the box score a little bit more carefully

Nene was about the only Nugget tonight that actually played like he gave a shit.

His stat line: 10 points, 10 boards, 5 assists (team high), 3 steals (team & game high) and 3 blocks (also a team & game high).

Again, I really don’t know where you get this logic that “2 blocks and a rebound in the fourth quarter NEVER makes up for ONE ASSIST in the 3rd”, because nobody else really did jack shit in the second half either. George Karl’s funky, and entirely illogical lineups and rotations were what killed us tonight. Maybe if George had actually played Nene a bit more in the 3rd instead of the bench players, he would have been more productive. But again, even if he made more of an impact in the 3rd it’s unlikely we would have won.

by GoldenNugget on Nov 29, 2009 11:53 PM MST up reply actions  

you need to sign up for remedial reading class too

nene’s 1st half stat line 9 points, 6 rebounds and 4 assists. throw in a general math class while you are at it. mr. played like he gave a shit contributed 1 point, 4 rebounds and 1 assist in the second half. just in case you missed it denver scored 12 points in the third quarter. so while mr. played like he gave a shit had 1 assist in the same 3rd quarter you wonder why karl did not play him more. let’s not forget your clueless observation about the line ups. t-wolves went on a 14-0 run with the starters on the floor to begin the 3rd quarter. you think karl needs more nene. i made an analogy that nene disappeared and broke down his stats each quarter to illustrate my point. you need to take some of your own advise and check the box score a little bit more carefully. the third quarter was the turning point in the game. the loss has nothing to do with funky and entirely illogical lineups and rotations unless you think melo, kmart, nene, billups and afflalo are funky and illogical. denver was outscored 31 to 12 in the third quarter AND mr. played like he gave a shit had 1 assist, no points and no rebounds.

pick up a calf every day pretty soon you will be picking up a cow

by nohoops4u on Nov 30, 2009 12:49 AM MST up reply actions  

Big deal

Nene didn’t do much in the 3rd. Still not the reason we lost though. Your trying to play it like certain players lost the game. We lost as a team. As a team we only scored 12 points int he 3rd so the fact Nene didn’t score doesn’t really matter. And how many points did Melo have in the 3rd? If I remember Marlow saying correctly, I don’t think he had any? So why arn’t you on his case?

by GoldenNugget on Nov 30, 2009 2:00 AM MST up reply actions  

certain players did lose the game

they are called the STARTERS. i said nene was a magician and did a disappearing act. compared to other comments made that is some pretty mild stuff. i made the comment that karl should have pulled the starters after the t-wolves scored 10 points to start the second half and that includes melo. where nene is concerned he seems to always get off to a great start and then he shuts down. you are the one telling me to take a closer look at the box score. the box score does not back you up so now big deal. you also said denver lost because of george karl. now you say they lost as a team. seems like you want to have it both ways.

pick up a calf every day pretty soon you will be picking up a cow

by nohoops4u on Nov 30, 2009 2:23 AM MST up reply actions  

Hey, BOTH OF YOU!

Relax-unlike Andrew, I don’t feel the need to freak the fuck out about this…let alone read you two exchanging box/score stats.
You guys remember last year losing to the Nets by 42? Towards the end of the season during playoff positioning? COME ON!
Yes, some shit went horribly, HORRIBLY wrong. Bad decisions were made, and some really shitty basketball was played. But, fuck you guys, they got their asses kicked by another proffessional basketball team. We’re pissed about it, of course! And we have every right to be but at the end of the day, we knew this could happen on ANY GIVEN NIGHT. our team is so MERCURIAL that I’m actually more surprised that people are SURPRISED!
this season so far has been about figuring out this team. Starting in the off-season. We did nothing. NOTHING. but you can’t tell me that this team isn’t going to make noise in the playoffs. And don’t tell me that you don’t think it’s going to happen…
ANDREW- really? There’s no chance of us catching LA OR PHO? really? 17 games into a 82 game season?It’s seems to be a bit early for that…
I fucking pissed as hell they lost this game and yeah, it’s completely their fault. 100%.
But the way I look at our guys is: this one is going to sting for the rest of the season. Just watch. Somebody is going to pay for this, and most likely, it’s gonna be our next 65 opponents.
You bet your ass this is a fucking wake-up call.
Hopefully it’s more of a wake-up call for us as fans to start showing up to these games on time and fired up!
Everyone, including us fans played this game on paper…

And go easy on TY LAWSON, Andrew. Can the guy play like a rookie at least ONCE this season?

I watched buzzer-to-buzzer…..and im pissed. But the season is not lost. I promise.
Nohoops and Goldenugget- you guys are too good of fans to be arguing over NENE’s stat line…the WHOLE TEAM LOST, including the coaches. Pathetically.

by SternfluffsKobe on Nov 30, 2009 6:18 AM MST via mobile up reply actions  

Yup.

We shouldn’t be. But the Nuggets better absolutely be screaming at eachother and themselves this morning!!!

by SternfluffsKobe on Nov 30, 2009 10:22 AM MST via mobile up reply actions  

Geez guys

Shut the F___ up. Y’all just need to cut the shit out.

Nene had a good game, its just that he was playing injured. Nene didn’t have a disappearing act. Chauncey (0-10 FG, 0-8 threes), only 3 assists had an absolutely terrible second half. Melo (and I guess K-Mart for that matter) let Gomes absolutely run over him/them. After that 19-point first quarter, Melo didn’t really do anything. JR took the Antoine Walker personality again. Lawson really should have been playing more than Chauncey did the second half.

"Left hand, right hand, it doesn't matter. I'm amphibious." - Charles Shackleford
"If the NBA were on channel 5 and a bunch of frogs making love were on channel 4, I'd watch the frogs, even if they were coming in fuzzy." - Bobby Knight
"We have a great bunch of outside shooters. Unfortunately, all our games are played indoors." - Weldon Drew

by LACK on Nov 30, 2009 4:27 PM MST up reply actions  

how come

You say that you are blaming the starters, but do nothing but rip on Nene? And do you really need to insult us to get your point across? I can disagree with you and not claim that you need to take “remedial reading classes.” Does insulting us make you feel better at night? That’s very big of you.

And I said it before, and I’ll say it again, Nene did not have his best game last night, but he was NOT the reason we lost. Maybe his lack of offensive production in the second half could be attributed to by the fact that he is the only one looking to get shots for others. Especially in the second half last night, it was dribble the ball down the court and take a jump shot. Either melo, Chauncey, or JR were chucking up shots before we had any decent ball movement. Melo did the same thing against the Knicks, but he shot well so it didn’t hurt us terribly. Nene starts games off well, because his teammates and Karl make a point of getting him involved early. But then when the game gets to it’s later points, we typically move to a stagnant 1on1 offense. And nene does not benefit from this. The fact is that if we don’t shoot well, we don’t play well offensively. Hell, even the lowly T-wolves had better offensive movement and passing yesterday then we did. And that is pathetic.

The truly sad thing is that with the talent this team has, we could easily win 60 games. If we came out every night, and played furious, focused, and smart defense we are unstoppable no matter how our offense plays. Besides maybe the Lakers, Magic, and Celtics, we could have a bad offensive night and still win against any team in the league if we played our hearts out on the defensive end. And if we happened to play solid offensively as well, there is not a team in the world that can beat us. That is what pisses me off about games like last night. If we played up to our capability on the defensive end for 4 quarters against the T-wolves, we could score 70 points and still win. It’s especially hard to beat us when we play great d because so much of our offense is a product of making stops and forcing turnovers.

I’m glad that Karl ripped them last night, and I really hope it wakes them up. But there is no excuse to lose a game like that when we have the talent that we do. No excuse.

by ZTC_87 on Nov 30, 2009 10:26 PM MST up reply actions  

Wow Hahahahaha

What a loss. Unfortunately I bet on Nuggets to cover -14. Stupid!

by College Wolf on Nov 29, 2009 9:58 PM MST reply actions  

No Over-reaction: Disturbing Loss

Disturbing loss tonight, and this was very reminiscent of the Clippers loss. The Nuggs played a decent first half (19 assists?) and decided they could coast in the second half. Lots of standing and one-on-one play. Karl clearly should have had JR in for the final 5 minutes to at least give the team a chance with the 3 and the team down 10. Also, he should have demanded more touches for Nene in the post. Melo was slow footed and selfish, I still say there is something wrong with Chauncey, Bird becomes a non-factor when he isn’t hustling on defense, and JR had one of his bad-bad games.

by ACEIII on Nov 29, 2009 10:12 PM MST reply actions  

ther are no excuses!

we were well rested, were at home in denver, had an easy schedule the last week and it was against a poor team…we should have thumped these guys..no excuses we just flat out played like shit. I hope Andrew is right when he says it might be our wake up call to take lower teams seriously and never underestimate a team.
Our losses so far have come against Miami, Atlanta, Milwaukee, Clippers and T-wolves..now really we should have beaten both Clippers and T-wolves. but we underestimate the lower teams.
i hope that we don’t do this for the entire season…i reckon most of our losses will come against sub .500 teams this year..yet we will coast over the top teams..

by stan_26 on Nov 29, 2009 10:15 PM MST reply actions  

i total agree andrew horrific loss if the nuggets want to make it back to the western conference finals again there is no way they can do it by playing the way they are. Their playing lazy their not playing any defense and they are losing their focus against bad teams which is what we saw tonight. Last year i feel like if this happened the nuggets being up big and than allowing a bad team come back against them and take the lead chauncey would get the nuggets focus back and have them play the basketball we know they can play but this year i question chaunceys effort he has had terrible shooting nights on many occasions he has taken bad shots such as tonight and hasn’t played the defense we know he can play. My cousin lives in detroit and he told me the last couple of seasons when chauncey was with the pistons fans questioned his effort and focus with the team which now worries me with the nuggets.

by carmelo15 on Nov 29, 2009 10:23 PM MST reply actions  

Hastings called it in the middle of the huge TWolves run in the third

“This smells like the Clipper game.”

Nothing else to be said really. Got away from their game in the third, got extremely lackadaisical on defense, and before the knew it they were down five.

We will look back and remember these early games late in the season and wonder what might have been had we won the games that we should have won. A second seed? A third? A first?

The Nuggets have gotten away from theirs defensive intensity and it is costing them dearly.

Swats.

by BeefySwats on Nov 29, 2009 10:29 PM MST reply actions  

reminded me of Nuggets past

they sucked , played w/o passion & teamwork , Martin blew so many jumpers and played into the D who knew his jumpers would suck. Bird needs to get on his game, Billups plain looked like JR Swish, at his worst and so on.
Karl had great post game comments and then walked out.

by markph on Nov 29, 2009 11:40 PM MST reply actions  

Was like the 1997 season

This loss is JR’s fault. This loss is Chauncey’s fault. Melo scored 32, but couldn’t get a rhythm in the second half. Birdman got goddamn run over on defense again. Why did we have to sign him to that big deal when we coulda got Channing Frye and a true big man for that price?

"Left hand, right hand, it doesn't matter. I'm amphibious." - Charles Shackleford
"If the NBA were on channel 5 and a bunch of frogs making love were on channel 4, I'd watch the frogs, even if they were coming in fuzzy." - Bobby Knight
"We have a great bunch of outside shooters. Unfortunately, all our games are played indoors." - Weldon Drew

by LACK on Nov 30, 2009 4:29 PM MST up reply actions  

Karl most overrated coach in NBA

BTW, anyone else also notice Karl is always quick to pass blame around, but NEVER points the finger at himself?

As far as his coaching skills, he is the Norv Turner of the NBA.

by Yabba Dabba Dude on Nov 29, 2009 11:44 PM MST reply actions  

100% agree

This loss was entirely on him, yet when it comes down to it, he NEVER takes the blame. What a pathetic excuse for a head coach in the NBA. Just absolutely atrocious. He talks about how his players need to do all this crap, HE is the ONLY one who is in charge of it, so stand up like a man and take some blame!

by GoldenNugget on Nov 30, 2009 12:03 AM MST up reply actions  

What's wierd is

I used to be the first to blame Karl for EVERYTHING. and just recently realized that coaching basketball is not a science. It’s therapy. Meaning it’s about managing personalities and momentum more than it drawing up plays. Plays in basketball break down so quickly based on defensive and offensive effort.
Putting in the starters at the end if this game was not going to fix it. The Nuggets resigned themselves to losing it even when they got close. Fucking pisses me off! Karl IS in charge of rotations and timeouts etc…but not effort. Let’s face it. We are fans of a team that CHOOSES, for whatever reason, to not play to the best of their ability.
Come on guys. 900 wins as a coach? And we want him fired? How many championships has Jerry Sloan won? I only ask because I would bet after a loss like this that everyone is blaming Karl that everyone would take him over Karl at this point…Do you really think that Phil Jackson wouldve been able to “right the ship” during this game? He didn’t seem able to do anything about us when we beat them by 20+ a couple if weeks ago…
If anything, this loss is on the the players….with a little george Karl sprinkled on top…
The NBA IS A PLAYERS GAME more so than almost any other sport. He can’t coach them to NOT chuck up a three at the beginning of the shot clock…

by SternfluffsKobe on Nov 30, 2009 6:36 AM MST via mobile up reply actions  

He had a terrible game

The third quarter was pathetic. The blame goes around to the whole team, but Karl gets as much as anyone else. At least Anthony showed some frustration with the way the game was going and some determination working to try to score, get rebounds, and hustle. He called a timeout in the third after the 8-0 run to start, then essentially sat on his hands. I’m not even sure that timeout was Karl and not Billups. That third quarter was inexcuseable, and after Melo got that technical, where was Karl? Melo nearly drew another technical on a couple of occasions, while Karl sat there like a mute. This is a game he should have intentionally gotten tossed out of, at least been agressively using timeouts and substitutions to try to work for a win. Instead, we get to the end of the game with 3 timeouts left and the team that is winning has only one. You don’t get a bonus for unused timeouts, George!

by KarlSucks on Nov 30, 2009 4:19 PM MST up reply actions  

I hear what you're saying

I’m just commenting on the fact that firing George Karl probably is going a little far. But you’re right, EVERYONE is to blame.

by SternfluffsKobe on Nov 30, 2009 7:07 PM MST via mobile up reply actions  

“I don’t need any more coaching other than play hard with intensity and pride, that we can go in that locker room and feel good about every night,” Karl said. “And that’s my fault. That’s on me.”

http://www.denverpost.com/nuggets/ci_13891807
(today’s DP)

Not that I’m a Karl fan or anything.

"Woohoo Denver, Yeah... All right Denver justify my love!" ...Homer Simpson

by Thursty on Nov 30, 2009 8:48 AM MST up reply actions  

espn just had a little segment about whether this was the worse loss by a good team in nba history

their argument: no team with a .750+ winning percentage has ever lost to a team on a 15+ game losing streak. congrats nugs.

by Rainbow skyline on Nov 29, 2009 11:56 PM MST reply actions  

The Nuggets should be allowed to get an automatic L for the Golden State game

Ya know what? Fuhgettabouit. I’d advocate just getting automatic L’s for all our remaining games to get a very high draft pick, but then I realized our first rounder is in Memphis’s hands…

"Left hand, right hand, it doesn't matter. I'm amphibious." - Charles Shackleford
"If the NBA were on channel 5 and a bunch of frogs making love were on channel 4, I'd watch the frogs, even if they were coming in fuzzy." - Bobby Knight
"We have a great bunch of outside shooters. Unfortunately, all our games are played indoors." - Weldon Drew

by LACK on Nov 30, 2009 4:31 PM MST up reply actions  

Timberwolves fan here... yes... we're still left

our numbers have dwindled as you can expect… But a few things, the Nuggets are a damn good team. If their only issue is losing to teams like the Clippers and Timberwolves while beating the Lakers, Celtics, and Spurs of the game… they will be fine. Chauncey has been cold, but he is still a solid floor general (remember before him?), a good defender, a good passer, and he will get his shot back. I envy your team right now. They have really put it together.
That said, I completely agree with those of you on the “Fire George Karl” side of the equation. The man is a terrible coach. The only evidence you need of this is what he did for the team with AI here instead of Billups. Isolation sets left and right… downright ugly. I have been saying for a few years how George Karl is keeping his job because of his name and talent.
I would try not to take the loss too personally, our guys were playing with some fire tonight… no one wants to be the team to set the record for ineptitude. You also just happened to come on the rough end of a Ryan Gomes hot shooting night. Bad defense or not, he just shot lights out. It’s happened to the Wolves a few times this year. Even with bad defense, you’d think the law of averages would come into play.

Also, thanks to the few of you who came over to Canis to congratulate us, always nice to hear from other teams around the league (at least those not from Golden State of Mind or Blazers Edge, for the most part, both of those have some very intelligent posters). When all is said and done we are all just fans looking for our team to win. Yes, some of us… or you I guess… obviously get to see that more often than others, but you get my point ;-)

On our side of the fence, Kahn has been a godsend. The only reason you see him the way you do is because you choose to believe the national media and what they say. The man has come in and cut some costs while getting rid of the guys who were going to keep our club in mediocrity forever. Even if we kept them, resigning them would have become an issue after this year (Foye and Miller that is). Both of them would have commanded more money than they are worth. Sessions was obviously a steal, but is being utilized poorly. Hollins is an interesting pickup with a low bust potential for the money we are paying him. Pavlovic blows. Sending away Bassy and Craig Smith for eventually Mark Blount was painful, but it saved our owner some cash in a time where that is hard to come by in MN. We also tend to agree that the trade for Lawson was beneficial to both teams. Lawson wouldn’t be helping us to any more wins (especially in the future) and we are quite happy to have the Bobcats pick in a stronger draft this year, or most likely a high lottery pick in the future. Delayed gratification, but after a while even those of us who hated it right away came to accept it and like it. The PGs thing… it’s just annoying. We picked Lawson at your guys’ request and Calathes at Dallas’ request. Ellington is a SG. So in all reality, we picked 2 pgs instead of 5 like national media wants people to believe. Rubio would most likely not come for a while so Flynn was a smart choice (even if Rubio was here, Flynn would be a great sixth man). And really, who else outside of PGs was available and worth it? A large number of people at Canis believe that Jennings is still comparable to Flynn in terms of talent, but is in a much better system (Skiles runs everything through his PGs. Sessions and Ridnour have produced and neither are tremendous talents). Flynn is being held back, Rambis has even said he is not letting Flynn do what he is best at. i.e. taking him far out of his comfort zone.

Also, to Andrew Feinstein, some of this loss was ironically deserved for you. If you don’t know what I am talking about, reread your game thread intro. No offense, but it’s true.

Good luck and I’m definitely hoping to see you guys take the Lakers out of the playoffs come April!

by Mplax on Nov 30, 2009 12:15 AM MST reply actions   1 recs

Let me clarify

George Karl is keeping his job based off of his name and the talent of his team… not his talent as a coach… ugh.

by Mplax on Nov 30, 2009 12:17 AM MST up reply actions  

You didn't need to clarify

That was obvious. Great post though. I’m glad you can see that Karl is overrated and his firing is long overdue. You my friend, are welcome back any time.

by GoldenNugget on Nov 30, 2009 12:38 AM MST up reply actions  

Haha yeah... I just reread it and

it sounded like it could have been misconstrued.

Also, I’d love to hear your guys’ opinion of Earl. Do you still think he is on his upside or do you think he has peaked? He said he wanted to focus more on defense this year if I remember correctly, any sign of that?

by Mplax on Nov 30, 2009 12:46 AM MST up reply actions  

If by Earl you mean JR

I don’t know. I can’t really say he’s peaked, because he’s the type of players who’s potential is wildly sky high. But in my honest opinion, I think this year more than any is really hurting him coming off the bench. I just think hes way too good to be playing with the second unit as much as he does and it’s affecting his game negatively. I thought JR was playing his best ball last year in the playoffs along side Chauncey. They have great chemistry together and when he was playing with Chauncey he’s more disciplined. I guess I just think it’s bullshit that he hasnt’ even got a chance to start. Sure, if he started for a while and things weren’t clicking then I could understand Karl playing him off the bench, but he hasnt’ even got that chance. I would be really interested to see how he would play if the majority of his playing time was with the starters from the very beginning of the game where he could get into a groove. But that’s just my 2 cents.

by GoldenNugget on Nov 30, 2009 2:09 AM MST up reply actions  

agree

"Do not rest in defense. You can spend 24 seconds in offense on resting. If you do good enough on defense, you will be able to rest on offense."

by Lucas Navarrete on Nov 30, 2009 4:40 AM MST up reply actions  

The 2nd Team...

I totally know this loss is on all the Nuggets. They all played a part in this. But what is really bothering me is that the 2nd team never seems to build on a lead or manage to sustain a large lead. It felt like they let the Wolves back into the game before the starters came back in to finish the 2nd quarter. Why can’t they build on that lead? If the 2nd team had done that, maybe the game would have been over by halftime. The 2nd team has been doing this in other games (letting a team make a run and almost having to put the starters back in). I could be wrong, but wasn’t it against the Nets, and the TWolves in the Wednesday game. The first team still has no excuse for not turning the throttle back on once the 3rd quarter began, but I would like the 2nd team to start contributing more.

by Buffalo Bills Forever! on Nov 30, 2009 12:17 AM MST reply actions  

They don't need to build a lead

They kept the lead at around 15-20, which is all that really matters.

At least the Nuggets don’t have Terrell Owens…ha!

"Left hand, right hand, it doesn't matter. I'm amphibious." - Charles Shackleford
"If the NBA were on channel 5 and a bunch of frogs making love were on channel 4, I'd watch the frogs, even if they were coming in fuzzy." - Bobby Knight
"We have a great bunch of outside shooters. Unfortunately, all our games are played indoors." - Weldon Drew

by LACK on Nov 30, 2009 4:32 PM MST up reply actions  

not a champ night

I was so irritated when I watched this game. The first quarter was awesome it looked like the Nuggets that I know. The rest of the game was horrible. It just seemed like they wanted to stand around with their thumbs up their ass. The most exciting part of Denver’s game is their defense. I feel they have gotten away from it. I love watching the breakaway dunks and great blocks.

There is always going to be some sort of offense with them. I think the whole team needs to go to a training camp and have Afflalo show them how its done. He has sparked several runs by playing perfect defense. He also shut down Kobe, few have done that in the past without playing really dirty.

by jercasche on Nov 30, 2009 12:29 AM MST reply actions  

Afflalo

Love the guy. And I have only seen him guard Kobe. But I hate Kobe with a passion and Aaron played some downright beautiful defense against him. I hope we steal him from you guys. Anyone who can embarass a player of Kobe’s caliber is ok with me.

I think George Karl should get his dues for starting him ahead of Earl too (I just love that he wants to be called Earl now!). Don’t like him as a coach, but he is playing that perfectly. Same as Bowen ahead of Manu and taking advantage of the need for defense against the first units primary scorer and offense against the secondary units crappier defenders.

by Mplax on Nov 30, 2009 12:52 AM MST up reply actions  

JR is still JR!

From SLam Mag., November 11, 2009 : "Earl Smith? That’s so eight hours ago. Nuggets guard J.R. Smith made a big proclamation Tuesday morning — from now on, he wanted to be called by his given name, Earl. But by game time Tuesday night, he was back to being J.R. "There was too much controversy with the switch," Smith said after Denver’s 90-89 win in Chicago. "I got a lot of calls and text messages and e-mails. It wasn’t a good move."

by BlueDane on Nov 30, 2009 8:28 AM MST up reply actions  

Haha

oh man! And here I thought it was just announcers messing it up. He should have gone about it better. Pitched it along with the season premier of the show My Name is Earl. He’ll never make a good coach.

by Mplax on Nov 30, 2009 9:33 AM MST up reply actions  

George Karl is a f*ing idiot

Who the hell sits the leading scorer of the NBA almost the ENTIRE second quarter after he goes off for 19 in the first, and is coming off a career high 50 point game??? George freakin’ Karl. The man has absolutely no sense of momentum, and it cost us the game tonight. That move alone totally disrupted the entire flow of the game and set off the course of our demise. Sure, we finished off the half with a lead, but who knows how much more of a lead we would have had had Melo stayed in the game. It’s just mind-boggling. We had them right where we wanted them, up by 15 plus, and going about their routinely pathetic ways of playing losing basketball, meanwhile we were off to an amazing start playing team basketball through our superstar, and then he does it. He takes him out for an entire quarter and every ounce of momentum we had accumulated vanished. We then began playing one on one basketball with zero ball movement and lackadaisical defense, which overshadowed the way would would play the rest of the game. And the thing Iove most, is that our Stiff of an announcer, who couldn’t muster more than 5 points for an entire season in his career and hasn’t coached a moment in the NBA, can realize when to call timeouts, when the momentum is changing, when certain people are hot and NEED to be in the game, yet this enigma of a man (at least in my eyes) who has won over 900 games in the NBA can’t figure out any of this if his career depended on it, which it should. Hell, even the kid wonder, Marlowe, has a better coaching sense than George Karl. Funny thing is, I really could care less about this loss. Yes, likely this will end up costing us, just like the Spurs did themselves last season when they sat their starters against us, but I really don’t care. Part of our team is our coach and we will only go as far as he does, so I don’t want him to fool our fanbase with great regular season wins and high playoff seedings if we arn’t going to play up to our potential when it comes down to it. We are what we see, and what I saw tonight was lack of composure, heart, and desire to be the best. And it all stems from the coach. And that’s just how it is, like it or not.

by GoldenNugget on Nov 30, 2009 12:33 AM MST reply actions  

Golden Nugget

Well said,
Bravo, Magnificent
You’re the man.
Get rid of that picture

by samdman on Nov 30, 2009 9:45 AM MST up reply actions  

lol

Karl wishes he could look like my picture.

by GoldenNugget on Nov 30, 2009 12:15 PM MST up reply actions  

I’m waiting with Baited breath for the 40 “FIRE MELO” fanposts to come for this.

Bills fan? In Colorado? It's more likely than you think.

by UZ on Nov 30, 2009 12:52 AM MST reply actions  

sighs all around

the only person more tired than me (or you and nate) of saying “nuggets, play defense!” is probably george karl. but it’s an easy fix (as we’ve seen them play damn good D before) and i’m hopeful for the rest of the season.

just sad to see another crappy loss on the record.

by sharkbait77 on Nov 30, 2009 1:17 AM MST reply actions  

From a distance, it seems they endured too much “human” behaviour a.k.a. getting satisfied too quick, winning without high effort & execution, trying to outscore the last opponents rather than putting the clamps down….etc.
As long as they win that way, it covers up the sloppy play.

But every once in a while, a good team playing halfhearted will get beat by an inferior team. It’s a looooooong season.
In the NBA, (good) teams normally respond well after these kind of losses. At least for the next game.
Expect them to be ready for GS. (Otherwise, the coaching fails)

The Charles Barkley 2009/10 Ancestors Count: 2 Grandmothers , 0 Mother Alltime: Reg. 25-0 Playoffs 7-0

"There were arms coming from everywhere, and I knew they weren’t going for the ball," Miller said. "I was just trying to get [the shot] up before they called some crap like ‘on the ground.’ "
"What do you want me to do?" Wright asked. "Do you want me to Derek Fisher him?"
"Give them some fucking credit, i mean for real." Jackson said.
"I just fell on my face for no reason," Bryant deadpanned. "I'm a klutz."
"Fucking right i'm preachin' it!" Carlisle replied.
"Rough life, isn't it. It's tough all over, isn't it." Smith chuckled.
" Let the Golden Child do that, or one of the NBA Without Border kids do that, it's all fine and dandy." -- Wallace on flopping in the NBA (for the low price of just 30,000 $). "They've got to know that he's a [darn] flopper. That's all Turkododo do."
Mutombo, Ewing and Yao at the restaurant...
MUTOMBO: "The chicken is the bomb."
EWING: [Rubbing belly] "I gotta go work out tonight. I'm full. You got a treadmill for me?"
YAO: " Leave your car keys here and run home. I'll give you the keys tomorrow."

by DOH on Nov 30, 2009 2:37 AM MST reply actions  

You said it

I wish it had been against the nets or the knicks, but I felt an embarrassment like this coming. Honestly I give GK a pass because it’s clear to me now our best players are playing and not getting it done. Bottom line – this team thinks too highly of themselves.

The nuggets used to be known for bruising physical defense and all out intensity, they have forgotten that and labelled themselves soem kind of elite team after losing to LA in the WCF. It sucks a fan to watch knowing they are not playing like a top 4 team and keep wIring for them to come back to earth and start putting in work that got them here. Everyone needs to man up but I’m calling out CB1 for his retarded swagger Because this team has a lot to prove if they want to be considered everyones “big game”

I think I’m gonna throw up

by runningdonut on Nov 30, 2009 4:20 AM MST via mobile reply actions  

Fire George Karl

Two very bad losses close together have to be on the coach. This was the bloody Twolves. Sure, they have an aussie but they really suck bad.

can a coach that lets these losses occur win a finals series? Not to mention his previous finals “efforts”.

A change of coach now might fire the players up and leave enough time to settle for the playoffs.

Julian from Australia

by j-mac31 on Nov 30, 2009 5:24 AM MST via mobile reply actions  

And recently especially

You look at what coaching changes have done in the sports community. Tomlin with the Steelers, the new Colts coach, and right here at home with Tracy and the Rockeis and McDaniels with the Broncos. The thing all those coaches have in common, the guy they replaced was incredibly successful (non including Hurdle). Coaching changes are important to teams for a wide variety of reasons. But one of the most important, is when the coach loses the players. That is the type of situation I have seen recently. If Karl pleads to the media after the game about how his players don’t do what he says, then they arn’t with him anymore. Hell, I’m not sure they ever were in the first place, but it seems like now more than ever, they simply arn’t with him. I’m not advocating for Karl’s dismissal, but if he were do be fired I wouldn’t have any problem with it.

by GoldenNugget on Nov 30, 2009 12:22 PM MST up reply actions  

Some of you guys really take things to the extreme...

but I do agree that this loss is disgusting. what’s more is that I have to leave my house here in MPLS and here about it from everyone which is some shit.

What I don’t understand, and i know somebody already mentioned it in a nice post, but I have to write it out myself. I can’t just put +1. Carmelo scores 19 in the first quarter and you then sit him for roughly 8 minutes of the second quarter? how does that make sense? granted melo is a pro, but i would imagine it’s not easy to come out hot as fire (no homo) and then be sat down for 8 minutes and then asked to pick it back up. I’m not calling for the firing of Karl, but it just doesn’t add up to me. I would let Melo keep going until he collapsed on the score (after scoring 60 points) and the Nuggets would’ve never lost this game. Oddly enough, I saw Karl do the same thing in the Clippers game. Melo came out and carried the offense and when he took him out for almost the entire second quarter, the offense stalled.

Aside from that, I have to ask what is up with the Birdman. Yeah yeah tendinitis but is he going to remain this useless for the rest of the season? the rest of his contract? I don’t think he’s necessarily doing bad, but he’s not the intimidator that he was last year.

by NugNugz on Nov 30, 2009 7:23 AM MST reply actions  

Bad loss ...

but I didn’t have a problem seeing Melo sit much of the second quarter. Don’t forget, the game was lost in the 3rd quarter with Melo in the game, not the second quarter, when the 2nd unit played like crap, but only gave up 1-point to the T-wolves. Karl did the right thing resting his starters (and reducing the risk of injury).

Would Melo have kept pouring on the points in the 2nd quarter if Karl would have left him in? We’ll never know, but Karl was just doing what any NBA coach would have done – resting his starters assuming that they would at least be able to play ONE OF THE WORST F-ing teams in the NBA close to even the rest of the game, especially a home game. We weren’t playing the freaking Lakers, resting Anthony and the rest of the starters seemed pretty low risk to me.

Still this team is a troubling team. At the moment I think Birdman is the weakest link in the regular rotation. The guy cannot play defense for crap and he frequently gets in the way on offense. Worse yet, everyone’s shooting – except for Melo – seems to be in a slump (Billups, AA), mini-slump (Lawson) or erratic (JR Smith – yes he is always erratic on the road, but at home?).

The constant switching on defense against small/semi-quick teams has got to stop. For this very reason, I’m more concerned about our next game against G.S. then I am the Spurs. We are toast when Atlanta comes to town if we continue plodding along on defense. I’m not sure who the blame goes to here, but the coaching staff has to accept some of it.

by JTR on Nov 30, 2009 8:17 AM MST reply actions  

I understand your thinking

But it’s not the way it works. Even Phil Jackson doesn’t sit Kobe for most of the 2nd quarter. Players go cold when they sit that long. If Karl would stick to normal rotations in the 2nd quarter REGARDLESS of the score, I will promise you the outcome of the game would have been much different. If it is a blowout, you pull the starters in the 4th quarter.

That simple

by philipba on Nov 30, 2009 9:14 AM MST up reply actions  

Again . . .

the game was lost in the 3rd quarter not the second.

Melo sits at half-time no matter what, during which time, according to your theory, Melo possibly goes cold.

If this team needs to count on Melo to beat the T-wolves, we are screwed anyway.

by JTR on Nov 30, 2009 9:55 AM MST up reply actions   1 recs

No

the game was lost in the SECOND, when he sat Melo. Sure, the lead was safe… AT THE TIME. But luckily we can look at things now that they are all said and done and realize that had Melo stayed in for the start of the 2nd, and played most of the 2nd, the lead would have been insurmountable and the nail would have thoroughly been hammered into the T-Wolves coffin my Melo.

by GoldenNugget on Nov 30, 2009 12:31 PM MST up reply actions  

Karl must think his players don't love to play the game

Because ANYBODY who was as hot as Melo in the 1st would have wanted to stay in the game. Melo was on pace for 80. Yeah, he wouldn’t have done that, but wtf? Yanking him after a 20 point quarter is just naive, especially for a guy with as many wins as he has. It’s not about resting when you are that hot. Ask any player in the NBA, if they were that hot would they have wanted to sit? Hell no! These guys love to play this game and Karl’s game managment prevents them from enjoying playing as much as they should.

by GoldenNugget on Nov 30, 2009 12:28 PM MST up reply actions  

Revolves around the PG

The way Chauncey Billups plays dictates a lot on how the team will play. The PG is the General on the floor. He dictates where the ball will go on offense, and is the first defender on defense (on the ball).
All of his statistics are down from his career avg (points, shooting %, assists, steals, FT %). And on D, he seems a step slow. A combination of him being 33, and the new PG’s coming into the league are just faster (i.e. Ty Lawson).
However, I do believe Chauncey is mature enough to watch film, listen to coaches and turn this thing around. I just hope it happens sooner rather than later.

by CSprings_Tommy on Nov 30, 2009 8:35 AM MST reply actions  

Comes back to the "Is it Phil Jackson or is it MJ and Kobe?" argument

Imo, MJ and Kobe didn’t/don’t allow their teams to take nights off, moreso MJ than Kobe. Phil Jackson is a great coach, no doubt, but without a superstar who also demands maximum effort from his teammates every damn night, he probably wouldn’t have a bajillion rings. Melo is getting to the next level. But until he consistently works his tail off on both ends of the court and demands the same from his teammates, this team isn’t going to get to the next level.

And with the 32nd pick in the 2009 NHL draft, the Red Wings select: Someone other than Ryan O'Reilly. LOL@Detoilet.

by Bob in Boulder on Nov 30, 2009 10:12 AM MST reply actions   1 recs

I hate to say I told you so... sorta

I called out the efforts of this team a while back. It was actually after the 10/29 WIN vs. Portland. No, the red flags then weren’t the same as now, but there were flags and I still don’t see answers to two of them in particular. Chauncey and Birdman.

Anyway, I haven’t liked the start to this season very much. I think this will be a wake up call to the ho-hum approach to playing each game like a professional, with passion and effort. No way this should have happened. This isn’t the same team as last year. It “COULD” be better than last year, once it finds it’s way (partly Karl’s dilema to manage) but it’s not going to happen if Chauncey can’t score and Birdman doesn’t play the defense he’s known for, amongst other seemingly smaller issues we have here. All is NOT well in Nuggets-land right now. Face it.

by stiffy on Nov 30, 2009 10:18 AM MST reply actions  

Billups and 3-pt. Shooting ...

To say Chauncey can’t score is a bit misleading. He’s averaging 16.6 ppg this year (above his career average of 15.1) and he did score 14 points last night. Although, I agree – the only reason he was able to muster any offense is because he got himself to the free throw line (8-10). His shot selection was poor at times, but overall he just was missing shots that HE usually knocks down.

What I’d like to see is the Nuggets recognize when they are not shooting well from three-point land. Billups was just 2-8 from deep and the team against the T-Wolves went 6-24 from distance. That’s 18 potential shots that could have been taken from somewhere else on the floor … ideally in the paint. That’s 36 points worth of two point makes in a game where the team lost by 6 points. Taking the higher percentage shot is sometimes the best move when the team is cold from the outside. Very frustrating.

Denver Stiffs.com: Defending the sovereignty of Nuggets Nation.

by Nate Timmons on Nov 30, 2009 10:48 AM MST up reply actions  

And..

how many of those 18 missed 3 balls were recovered by the T’wolves and converted into points?
All out bad play. Karl was quoted in the post game interview, that he didn’t have a team that plays hard for a whole game. Kinda shameful

by Joelsopinion on Nov 30, 2009 12:34 PM MST up reply actions  

Ya, I read Karl's quotes. I need to head over to NBA.com and watch the post-game interviews.

The good news … the team said all the right stuff after the loss and the hope is that they can come out and prove they learned something from this game.

Denver Stiffs.com: Defending the sovereignty of Nuggets Nation.

by Nate Timmons on Nov 30, 2009 12:38 PM MST up reply actions  

Birdman

Did the Nuggets place too much on Bird?

by CSprings_Tommy on Dec 1, 2009 8:42 AM MST up reply actions  

He has a lot of pressure for sure being the only actual big guy off the bench over 6'10'' (that plays).

But offensive rebounding is all about desire and getting dirty. I’ll discuss it in my Warriors preview that will be up in a little while.

Denver Stiffs.com: Defending the sovereignty of Nuggets Nation.

by Nate Timmons on Dec 1, 2009 10:02 AM MST up reply actions  

Billups has had 4 good 3pt shooting games out of 17

In those four games he hit 17 of 26 (NY, Min, Utah, Ind, notice that Min NY and Uth are all poor defensive teams) . .against the rest of the schedule, he is 26% on almost 5 shots per game. A forced JR three with two guys on him has a good a % as Billups in those games.

Billups is still our best PG, but if this it what were are getting from him, Denver is not an elite team. It is not just he numbers, but this distribution of the numbers . .a few good games mixed with many mediocore to poor games will be trouble.

BTW . .not sure I agree with the math of only taking missed 3 three and deducing that two pointers would have been better . . by my calc, using the same logic.the Nugs missed 31 2 pt shots which if they had shot as 3 could have been 93 more points. Your pt is still valid, but the example is biased.

by Frontrange on Nov 30, 2009 1:14 PM MST up reply actions  

I like Nate's thought regarding

REALIZING when something needs to change. I think that’s the big (real) issue here that bugs everyone. It’s quite baffling actually, especially when we novice viewers can see what’s going on from the TV. Karl does need to pull guys if they’re not going to stick to the game plan (a la JR chucking 3’s after being told to stop) but guys need to heed his coaching demands more than anything if he’s actually able to see these issues unfold in front of him. Otherwise ultimately, I guess it falls on the coaches shoulders to put guys in the game that are going to abide by his gameplan. If he’s not going to make that move (put frickin Petro at SG to prove a point why dontcha one time?) he really doesn’t have much to argue when criticism falls to him.

That plus Frontrange is right… Chauncey’s level of play is simply not the All-Star caliber we’ve come to expect whatsoever. Why he’s not able to drain J’s is a pretty peculiar dilema we’re facing. If this is the best we’re gonna get from Chauncey then that steal of a trade is a pretty short lived buzz. Love the guy and pull hard for him, but I am getting pretty saddened by his inability to knock the shots down.

by stiffy on Nov 30, 2009 1:58 PM MST up reply actions  

I think it's the tempo cauing fatigue

We seem to be playing at a faster tempo in the Loses this year. We’re getting into shooting matches against guys with nothing to lose. They chuck a 3 we chuck a 3. A bunch of long rebounds leading to fastbreak offense and fast transition defense. We’re running CB’s legs out from under him. We need to go back to letting him control the game.

Ever since the Win over the laker, the one where we just out ran them in the 3rd, it seems that that has become a little too prevelant. We can’t just try and out run everyone that comes to the Can. (What is this a Samuel L. Jackson movie?)

When the person that controls the offense and feeds Melo is tired we end up with a lot of sloppy shots. Let CB run his slower paced smooth offense and leave the uptempo game to the Rook and Earl.

by Joelsopinion on Nov 30, 2009 3:28 PM MST up reply actions  

david thompson

scored 78 points in one game AND 32 points in a quarter without a 3 point shot. melo scored 50 points in one game and made only one 3 point shot. there are too many transition 3 point shots. another problem is taking a 3 point shot early in the half court offense. that was the problem last season with melo, earl and kleiza. lk is gone, melo has reduced his to a minimum and earl is still earl. denver had 10 more 3 pointers than their season average against minnesota.

pick up a calf every day pretty soon you will be picking up a cow

by nohoops4u on Nov 30, 2009 2:38 PM MST up reply actions   1 recs

Workin"

The Nugget haters are out. Face it, you don’t care about them. You just want to pitch negativity.

I’m still a Balkman fan and wish he got some back-up bigman minutes. Malik Allen too. When we let our trade exemptions expire we lost the chance to have a decent back up big man who rebounds and plays defense. Maybe Fabricio Oberto, Etan Thomas, etc. Banking only on Birdman, who is noticiably hurt, isn’t working.

Having JR and Chauncey miss that many shots without anyone crashing the boards is what killed the Nuggets. Not moving the ball via set formations are also a killer.

We made the Finals last year by out working our opponents on both ends of the court. A Sunday after Thanksgving was pretty lazy for everyone I knew, so maybe that’s what hit our team. Now back to work.

by elcarg on Nov 30, 2009 11:27 AM MST reply actions   1 recs

Hater my ass

Save it elcarg… nobody’s hating. We’re all just voicing why we see issues with the Nuggets right now. That doesn’t make you a hater, it makes you an observant fan, nothing more. We all want the Nuggies to win, sans a few Laker squatters here and there.

I don’t know you but I wouldn’t put it past you to be one of the fans who is fine with just making the WCF’s last year and if that’s as far as this group of guys can get then you’re happy with it. I for one am not though. I expect them to push all the way to the top or die trying. If you can’t see that things need to improve by a loss at home, on more than adequate rest to the lowly T-Wolves, then you need to wise up, or just keep living in dreamland. A loss like this could make the difference in a seeding for the playoffs. Simply unacceptable, as Andy put it.

by stiffy on Nov 30, 2009 2:04 PM MST up reply actions  

This team is such bullshit

Kenyon and Chauncey talked a bunch of garbage after the game like they needed this loss and got what they deserved. Was the clipper loss and all of the shit wins not enough to get them to try? They also said before the laker game that winning would be nice but thy didn’t need it to make their season or anything. What a joke. This team thinks they are the shit. We made it to the WCF and lost in a blowout at home so what exactly have they proven?

It’s crazy man like I said fuck basketball it will all be a lot easier for us to start lowering expectations now before these rich assholes ruin a golden oppurtunity even further

by runningdonut on Nov 30, 2009 12:41 PM MST via mobile reply actions  

Championship caliber teams do not play like these Nuggets

I agree totally with all of Andrew’s comments. 100%! Unacceptable loss. Yes it is early in the season. But you don’t want losses like this to come back and bite you later in the year – which this one very well could. Now the Lakers of last season did lose both times to the Charlotte Bobcats. But how many other unacceptable or bad losses did the Lakers have? Championship caliber teams do not almost lose at home to a 3 win team like the Knicks and then lose to a 1-15 team at home (and that 1 win was against the OhFer NJ Nets)! Kmart should never take another outside shot. His flat shot is about as ugly as Shawn Marions flick shots. But at least Marion’s shots have some air under them. I can’t believe a coach somewhere in Kmart’s career hasn’t worked with him on his outside shot? As said in other comments – if this loss isn’t a wake up call for this team then it will be a long season and if they do make the playoffs it will bean early exit.

by redrockerb on Nov 30, 2009 1:18 PM MST reply actions  

my perception of this team really changed last night

I really thought this was a focused, professional outfit with their eye on the prize. I was willing to forgive the Clippers loss on the road and a few lackluster games against bad teams because every team has those games. But championship teams do not have losses like this. Now I’m thinking this team is like the ‘07 version: hyper-talented, but they only show up when they feel like it, and it will cost them in the playoff seeding, no doubt about it. Maybe they can turn it on again in the playoffs and have a fighting chance against the lakers in the WCFs-that’s the best we can hope for now. any dreams of the first seed are all but dead. But I really thought we had more hope than “maybe we’ll get hot in the playoffs”.

by Rainbow skyline on Nov 30, 2009 1:47 PM MST reply actions  

It's a little too soon to throw in the towel don't you think?

I am not happy with last night’s game but to say things like “it will cost them in the playoff seeding” is a bit premature. These are not the 07 Nuggets. Have some faith will ya!

by Joelsopinion on Nov 30, 2009 3:36 PM MST up reply actions  

you dont think a couple really bad losses wont them knock them down a seed or two?

last year’s version barely had any losses like this. this year we already have two. last year one less win would have knocked us down to the 4th seed and the playoffs unfold differently. and the standings at the top will almost surely be very tight again this year.

by Rainbow skyline on Nov 30, 2009 10:46 PM MST up reply actions  

I didn't say it wouldn't

I said it’s premature to make that statement. I usually wait until after the All Star break to start to assume sedding spots.

by Joelsopinion on Dec 1, 2009 10:25 AM MST up reply actions  

There are only two kinds of losses...

Losses that end your season and losses that don’t.

Practice doesn't make perfect. Perfect practice makes perfect.

by Big Mickey D on Nov 30, 2009 3:12 PM MST reply actions  

Tough one to swallow but it happens...

I would be more concerned if they got blown out by the Spurs or the Suns.

by Pusherman on Nov 30, 2009 5:05 PM MST reply actions  

Chauncey Billups

Leading His Team To Something™

I support the Tornado Release ... and Young Bucks.

by Prevenge on Nov 30, 2009 11:44 PM MST reply actions  

amen.

I am one of the few that think we will be better with Ty right now…

"Do not rest in defense. You can spend 24 seconds in offense on resting. If you do good enough on defense, you will be able to rest on offense."

by Lucas Navarrete on Dec 1, 2009 6:44 AM MST up reply actions  

please elaborate

You want them to bench billups? To start a rookie who’s under 6 feet tall? Why not just start Anthony Carter while they’re at it?

by KarlSucks on Dec 1, 2009 9:12 AM MST up reply actions  

Yes.

I just dont agree with the whole Billups has been the only key to Denver’s success.
I simply see Billups as a great player going down because of his age, and I think he can still be used as a Rasheed type of player in this Nuggets.
Is Rasheed better than Perkins? sure, but, I think the Celts are better off with Perks starting and playing major minutes and reserving Sheed for crunch time and some difficult stretches of the game (this would be important because really think he needs to play along with J.R).

I don’t think it is as crazy as it sounds…

"Do not rest in defense. You can spend 24 seconds in offense on resting. If you do good enough on defense, you will be able to rest on offense."

by Lucas Navarrete on Dec 1, 2009 9:22 AM MST up reply actions  

Very interesting take ...

Denver Stiffs.com: Defending the sovereignty of Nuggets Nation.

by Nate Timmons on Dec 1, 2009 10:03 AM MST up reply actions  

Could you agree with it, Nate?

"Do not rest in defense. You can spend 24 seconds in offense on resting. If you do good enough on defense, you will be able to rest on offense."

by Lucas Navarrete on Dec 1, 2009 10:07 AM MST up reply actions  

Not this season, but I like the burn that Lawson is getting and some of the rest he can provide Billups.

I think CB1 is still the best option for this team this season and may just be in a funk even if he’s slowed down a touch. He did just drop 32 on the Knicks.

But after this season the Lawson starting option may come into play (maybe not next year either, but who knows.)

Denver Stiffs.com: Defending the sovereignty of Nuggets Nation.

by Nate Timmons on Dec 1, 2009 12:13 PM MST up reply actions  

Hear him out

Because you know CB1 isn’t going to play forever and TY is the preverbial pg. He’s got to start somewhere and at some point
Why not throw him into the fire now when CB1 can mentor him actively and CB1 can rest and be ready for the end of the season.
Being 33 with 70 something games to go is physically demanding.
We can always bench him reverse their rolls
AC is usless and should do an AI

by samdman on Dec 1, 2009 9:42 AM MST up reply actions  

That's right

"Do not rest in defense. You can spend 24 seconds in offense on resting. If you do good enough on defense, you will be able to rest on offense."

by Lucas Navarrete on Dec 1, 2009 9:46 AM MST up reply actions  

I agree with the whole plan of Billups eventually getting a reduced role. I’d be surprised if it happens so early this season, and wouldn’t be surprised if Lawson is never the starter, even after Billups is gone. Lawson is so small, I really fear that he would be abused on defense going against starters. So far, he has been getting by going against the number 2’s, but the number 1’s might eat him alive. Even Chris Paul could post up against Lawson. I’ve been impressed with Lawson so far, but he may simply be a sixth man.

by KarlSucks on Dec 1, 2009 11:26 AM MST up reply actions   1 recs

Point well taken

about TY’s height. And I’m as preplexed as all out doors with this acquition however he is a good player. He is better on his off night than AC on his best night. Saying this I hope you’re right about him being a sixth man because a lack of height at the pq is going to require that he gets help and that’s adding another burden to the defense.

by samdman on Dec 1, 2009 2:12 PM MST up reply actions  

Pathetic

I’m not even going to write an arguement to this because it doesn’t justify one

by Gasus on Dec 4, 2009 3:10 PM MST up reply actions  

Billups needs to start

this year, next year, and I would even say until his contract expires. I think much like the Olympics last year where they started Kidd over Deron and CP3, yet they played much more time than Kidd. I would like to see Ty’s minutes increase this year even more, and next year they should eclipse Billups’, but it’s still important for Billups to start since he is the leader of the team.

by GoldenNugget on Dec 1, 2009 11:10 PM MST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Proprietors
Andrew Feinstein
(denverstiffs@gmail.com)
Nate Timmons
(ntimmons73@yahoo.com)

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Fire George Karl, please!!!!
442_small
Masai Ujiri - GM of the Year

Recent FanPosts

Crest_small
Laker beat Nuggets THREAD
Surfboardcopy2_small
Lakers v Nuggets 2nd half thread
Broncos_stadium-9115_small
Wilson Chandler coming back long-term?
Small
Does Denver actually have depth?
Newtromneylol_small
half price Nuggets tickets
Small
George Karl's blunder
Small
Hypothetical trade that gets us a center (but still won't happen)
Nba_denver_nuggets_logo_small
The Nuggies need a late game general!!!
Fat_lever_small
Not Sold on the Nuggets Yet

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

STIFF LIST (as of 1/30 by Jeff Morton)

1. THE ORLANDO MAGIC
After starting the season so well with the Dwight Howard trade drama (10-3) - the Magic have fallen apart (2-5 since) with embarrassing losses to the Celtics (twice), Hornets, and Pacers. Trade Dwight already!

2. CHAUNCEY BILLUPS' FLOP VS. NUGGETS
In the waning seconds of Sunday's game against the Clippers, Chauncey pulled off an acting performance so good it deserved an Academy Award. If he was still a Nugget we would love it, but he's not. STIFF!

3. JIMMER FREDETTE
Dude, if you are going to take the game-winning shot, at least draw some iron: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNO1goJOruQ

4. GEORGE KARL'S 4TH QUARTER AGAINST THE CLIPPERS
Getting out coached by Vinny Del Negro should be a nice wake-up call. Going away from Gallo. Leaving Al Harrington in. Using Rudy Fernandez at point guard. And going ultra small contributed to the Nuggets loss.

5. JEFF MORTON
For saying that the Nuggets would skimp on payroll and go cheap like the Avalanche. Clearly I was wrong and deserve to be on this Stiff List. I can only hope that the gods of basketball forgive me.

DENVER STIFFS ON FACEBOOK

Enter your email for updates

Email:

Denver Stiffs on Twitter

DENVER STIFFS HALL OF FAME

2010 INDUCTION CLASS

F - Raef LaFrentz
F - Mark Pope
C - Priest Lauderdale
G - DerMarr Johnson
G - Darnell Mee
L.A. - Bernie Bickerstaff

2009 INDUCTION CLASS

F - Bill Hanzlik
F - Ryan Bowen
C - Danny Schayes
G - Julius Hodge
G - Junior Harrington

2008 INDUCTION CLASS

F - Nikoloz Tskitishvili
F - Joe Wolf
F - Tony Battie
C - Scott Hastings
G - Tariq Abdul-Wahad
G - Mark Macon


Proprietors

304196_2551840719324_1353064703_32974236_1387484886_n_small Nate Timmons

Dsc00033_small Andrew Feinstein

Writer

Me_oh_my_oh_small Jeffrey Morton