More on Melo's big shot....
Allow me to beat this dead horse a few more times.Even though I missed watching almost all of Game 3 live because I was at a wedding, I was able to catch the final two minutes at the bar during the reception alongside fellow Nuggets fans. Maybe it was because the audio for the game was off, maybe it was because I'm a biased homer of a Nuggets fan or maybe it was because I had a few drinks in me when I watched it, but Antoine Wright's (alleged) intentional foul prior to Carmelo Anthony sinking the greatest shot in modern Nuggets history never struck me as "call worthy" while watching it live.
Admittedly I’ve had the advantage since of reading all the comments left after the Game 3 recap plus all the editorials written from both sides regarding Saturday night’s (correct) non-call on Antoine Wright. But my position remains firm: shame on the NBA for issuing an apology and tainting one of the most memorable moments in Nuggets playoff history.
Sure, Wright bumped Melo a bit, but seeing it live Saturday night and again and again on the highlights throughout Sunday, I'm still not seeing an obvious intentional foul call here (conversely, when Derek Fisher fouled Brent Barry last year and the same referee - Mark Wunderlich - didn't make the call, that was blatant negligence as Fisher clearly hammered Barry, preventing Barry from being able to make his three-point attempt). Mavericks head coach Rick Carlisle knows – and his players should know – that the refs don’t want to decide the end of game, much less playoff games. If Wright wanted to foul Melo he should have actually fouled him – i.e. wrapped him up as Doc Rivers has since instructed his players to do. But instead, not only did Wright not foul Melo, but after his last bump he gave the "hands up" motion to ensure he didn’t get flagged fearing Melo would be rewarded with three free throws on the shot attempt.
As my friend Matt from Sacramento (a loyal Sacramento Kings fan and Denver Stiffs reader, imagine that) astutely pointed out in an email on Sunday morning: Would the Mavericks be complaining about the non-call if Melo had missed?
Of course not. And that point should end the argument in favor of the Mavericks position right there. Simply put, the Mavericks can't have it both ways. They can't desperately avoid sending Melo to the line for three free throw attempts while simultaneously bitch that a call should have been made.
Furthermore, if the Mavericks want to be mad at someone, they should be mad at themselves for blowing a must-win playoff home game in which Melo shot 9-24, J.R. Smith shot 3-10, Nene shot 2-10 and Chris Andersen fouled out. Have fun trying to beat our Nuggets when those four have average nights in Game 4. And let's not forget the Mavericks allowing Melo to literally waltz right into the basket for an easy dunk (a la what the Hawks have been allowing LeBron James to do) with about 30 seconds left, cutting a four-point lead to two. That was inexcusably embarrassing.
But losers blame the refs while winners move on to play another game or series. And that’s why the Mavericks are on the losing end of an insurmountable 3-0 series deficit right now.
Beyond the controversy surrounding the play, I think it's fair to ask: Was Carmelo Anthony’s game-winning shot in Game 3 the single greatest shot in Denver Nuggets franchise history?
As a self proclaimed amateur Nuggets historian, I’ve been racking my brain for a whole day now trying to come up with a shot bigger than the one Melo hit with a second left on Saturday night and am embarrassed to admit that I can’t seem to top it.
Unfortunately, when your favorite team has only a handful of division title banners in the rafters, has only appeared in two Western Conference Finals in its 32 year NBA history and has a franchise winning percentage that’s below .500, you don’t have a lot of memorable buzzer-beating shots that come to mind...especially in the playoffs.
When we think about the all-time great postseason shots, we think of Michael Jordan's hanging jumper over the Cavaliers Craig Ehlo in 1989, or Rex Chapman’s catch-and-shoot to lead his Suns to overtime against the Supersonics in 1997, or Reggie Miller’s eight points in 8.9 seconds to knock out the Knicks in 1995, or Ralph Sampson’s tip shot to drop the Lakers in 1986, or John Stockton's incredible series-winning three-pointer against the Rockets in Game 6 in 1997, or Kobe Bryant’s pop and shot against the Suns in 2006, or even Ray Allen’s game-tying three over Joakim Noah two weeks ago, or Derek Fisher’s game-winner with 0.4 seconds left against the Spurs in 2004, and so on. You know the list. It’s ingrained into every NBA fan’s brain. And there isn’t a single Nuggets shot on that list, until now thanks to Melo.
I just hope the NBA sees the errors of their ways, rescinds that ridiculous "apology" and includes Melo's big shot in future "Where Amazing Happens" highlight packages.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Nobody has mentioned the continuation aspect, plus even if the call is made -- there's still five seconds left and carmelo has hit more game-winning shots than ANYONE in the NBA the last three years.
As for the greatest postseason moment, the only one that comes to mind is Dikembe falling to the floor with the ball as the Nuggets beat the Sonics...i'll have to think about it more
by Michael L on May 11, 2009 12:16 AM MDT reply actions
Just a chump.
Meanwhile, read Woody today. Actual reporting! Well, gossip mongering at least. Point is, the refs stand behind the call. That Litvin guy - who is he anyway? Cuban's enabler in chief? What a dumb, pointless statement.
by jakester on May 11, 2009 1:37 AM MDT reply actions
by parce on May 11, 2009 6:57 AM MDT reply actions
I think at that point they (the Mavs) had a foul to give, didn't they? So Melo wouldn't have been shooting 3 free throws, they would have had to inbound it.
What cinches the no-call for me is that the guy threw up his arms, which indicates that he was trying *not* to get the foul. I think from a judgement standpoint, the ref was within his rights to not make the call. It wasn't a particularly obvious foul, and what it all boils down to is that Melo nailed it in the face of getting hacked, pressured and with the buzzer winding down.
If the positions were reversed, I would be pissed at the Nuggets for not seizing the game when they had the chance. Dallas let them stay in it. They had plenty of opportunities to put the Nuggets away and were unable to do it, essentially giving the Nugs a game that by all rights they probably should have lost.
Kudos to the Nuggets for battling to the end. You can't buy this kind of playoff experience (literally, ask Stan Kroenke), and they should remember that the game ain't over til it's over.
by grantarchy on May 11, 2009 8:25 AM MDT reply actions
It's sad when a ballet dancer has a higher Basketball IQ than a player, a team owner, 17,000 rabid fans, and the NBA front office.
I can't think of a bigger shot in recent Nugget history (12 years). That shot was huge. It broke the camel's back, and has deflated the Maverick's. I'm sure that it won't be the biggest of Melo's carreer either. He has a clutch jumper and is a clutch player.
As far as Cuban's shove, it was more servre than K-Mart's and unwarranted.
I think it's kinda funny that we had nothing better to talk about for the 4 day dry spell than the correct call on dirk's girlfriend bar status. I wonder what's gonna be the topic of conversation when the Nuggets sweep the Mavs tonight, and have to wait for a beaten up LA or Houston team?
It's strange thinking that Houston may pull the upset over Kobe and Coloner Sanders. Either way the series is going to be a long six or a possible 7 game series. Andrew in an earlier post you wrote something about the Lakers not being in a slump, and I'll agree with that. Kobe however has been slumping in his play. History has shown that the team generally falls apart if Kobe is playing, but not really playing. They'd be better off if Phil would actually admit to himself that Kobe is not the NBA's Messiah, and bench him if he's not playing well and let Gasol run the offense.
I think the Nuggets will have the better hand in the WCF over a banged up opponent. Whoever it may be.
by Joelsopinion on May 11, 2009 8:28 AM MDT reply actions
by wratha on May 11, 2009 8:50 AM MDT reply actions
Take for example the 3rd quarter where we had somethign like 16 fouls in 10 mins. If you were watching the game you know that about 1/2 of those don't really warrant a whislte. The refs were doing everyhting in their power to help the Mavs out, there is no other explaination, it's just to bad for them that Melo played to the whistle
by RPN on May 11, 2009 9:08 AM MDT reply actions
Question: Do the Nuggets whine that he was fouled if the shot does not go down?
Answer: Certainly not to the extent the Mavericks have. Melo, more so than any marquis player in the league, is used to NOT getting those calls. That's why he automatically plays right through them.
This game was offered in the previous 1:25 when Dirk missed (3) shots within 14 feet of the basket. Kidd all but said so himself.
As anyone who follows the NBA knows; the road team is going to try to keep it close until the end of the game so they have a chance to steal one. That's exactly what we did (despite AC's boneheaded defensive lapse where he left JT to double Dirk).
In regards to clutch shots; Melo hit two of them, both against the Thunder, that would have ended up landing us the 2 seed vs. the 4 seed. He has arrived!
by My3Cents on May 11, 2009 9:33 AM MDT reply actions
Andrew correctly equates this non-call to the non-call last year on Derek Fisher. Same story, same ref (who by the way was looking more at Melo's feet than the rest of the play). The NBA should be embarassed.
by My3Cents on May 11, 2009 9:41 AM MDT reply actions
Great ESPN article about Smooth:
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/eticket/story?page=090511/billups
by Brosephus Maximus on May 11, 2009 10:20 AM MDT reply actions
The other thing that no one is mentioning is that the Mavs shot 49 free throws, and got something like 16 fouls on the nuggets in the fourth quarter, whereas the Nuggets never even made it into the bonus. The only reason they were in the game at all is because of the fouls, so they can't complain too loudly about one call. They had the whole game to do something about it and a 4 point lead with 30 seconds left. If they played a little defense on the dunk by Anthony, there would have been less than :24 left when Dallas got the ball. Also, they shot too soon (hello J.R. Smith), which left about 7 seconds for the Nuggets. If Dallas runs the clock down, they could have heaved at shot at 4 seconds. One second in the air, one for a rebound, and that only leaves 2 seconds...just bad play by Dallas
by KarlSucks on May 11, 2009 10:28 AM MDT reply actions
I am upset about the apology, the NBA needs to stand up to the refs for credibility, unless it was wrongly called. It was a questionable and subjective...which most refs calls are anyways.
It doesn't matter. What matters now is how we are going finish the series and match up to our next opponent.
Awesome job Melo, we are all proud of you.
CB
by Anonymous on May 11, 2009 10:39 AM MDT reply actions
by KaiserSoze on May 11, 2009 11:17 AM MDT reply actions
I of course saw the final score and the highlights, but missed out on my chance to yell and shout, and truly experience this moment in Nuggets history.
That said, I must say that both the non-call and apology are total BS, imho. It was a bump, didn't even look intentional, and I'm glad that it wasn't called either way. It just didn't look like a foul, let alone a six-seconds-left playoff foul.
I'm very happy Melo made this shot, but I feel badly that he has this hanging over his head. It's like when the Spurs won the finals in the shortened season. I agree that it will never be on a commercial, which is a shame.
For the record I'd like to say that I don't think the NBA will allow anything other than a LeBron/Kobe matchup this year. They will do whatever it takes to make sure that happens.
by Do We Have Any Plays? on May 11, 2009 11:27 AM MDT reply actions
I also had the game on DVR. I made sure to record the show after the game in case it ran long. Mine recorded to just after the shot by Melo, so all I missed was the last shot by Dallas. I feel your pain, though. Like Andrew, I was at a wedding on Saturday. Hopefully the only one for this year.
by KarlSucks on May 11, 2009 11:45 AM MDT reply actions
Honestly, though, as he walked through the hall he had a look on his face like he may want to play elsewhere next season. And between Cuban and his stalker, I don't blame him.
by Do We Have Any Plays? on May 11, 2009 1:03 PM MDT reply actions
Dirk had to get to the bail hearing. That's why he left right away!
by My3Cents on May 11, 2009 1:28 PM MDT reply actions
by go nugs on May 11, 2009 2:03 PM MDT reply actions
I saw it live, it looked like a foul. It wasn't called. One team kept playing (kudos to Melo) and the other didn't. The rule of basketball is to play until you hear the whistle.
It is unfortunate that the conversation around the game is about the no call but that isn't the league's fault. And in time, people will remember the shot, not the no-call. It was remarkable that the Nugs were even in a position to win that game at all as poorly as they played offensively and as many fouls were called in that game. Credit the Nuggets for that, or blame the Mavs for that, but Wunderlich didn't decide the game in the slightest. The apology doesn't change that.
And it's great for Melo to finally have a moment deserving of a "where amazing happens" commercial.
by Eric B on May 11, 2009 2:20 PM MDT reply actions
Carmello's performance,
Mavericks collapse in the last minute of a game that was their's to lose,
how the nba stabs its refs in the back,
the non-call
by Anonymous on May 11, 2009 5:51 PM MDT reply actions


















