Does George Karl know who Renaldo Balkman is now?...
Nuggets/Thunder Recap...If there's one thing George Karl's supporters and critics have agreed on all season it's that he's underutilized Renaldo Balkman for no logical reason whatsoever. Before Balkman grabbed 14 rebounds to go along with nine points and six free throw attempts in just 22 minutes of playing time against the Jazz on Friday night, I was convinced that Karl couldn't pick Balkman out of a police lineup if he had to. Prior to that Jazz game, Balkman had an inexcusable eight DNP-CDs ("did not play, coach's decision") out of 11 games. And in one of those games, he played less than two minutes.
Balkman received yet another unjustified DNP-CD from Coach Karl on Monday against the Rockets. Like all of Balkman's DNP-CDs, this was completely absurd given that the Nuggets were visibly flat and no one (read: Anthony, Carmelo) was guarding Ron Artest. Call me crazy, but I'm pretty sure Balkman would have shadowed Artest's every move had he be given an opportunity to play. When you don't play your best energy guys, you end up with "acceptable losses."
Thankfully for us fans, Karl inputted Balkman into the starting lineup against the Thunder (sans Kevin Durant) tonight, and he was the best player on the floor while leading the Nuggets to a much needed victory. In 30 minutes of playing time, Balkman posted 14 points, 14 rebounds (eight offensive!), three assists, two steals and a block. Oh, and had he missed a few easy tip-ins while relentlessly distracting the Thunder on the defensive end, as well. And not surprisingly, when he was taken out of the game, Balkman received a standing ovation from the remaining fans at Pepsi Center.
I'm not exactly sure what Balkman needs to do to get more playing time in Coach Karl's "rotation" but I can only hope that Karl finally recognizes his value to the team. It's only come 66 games late.
Nuggets/Thunder Preview...
It's not raining. It's just cloudy.
The clouds will go away.
The sun will come up again.
Sounds poetic, doesn't it?
That was Nuggets head coach George Karl's less covered quote after the Nuggets lost to Houston on Monday night, the team's eighth loss in 11 games. The more covered quote was Karl calling the game an "acceptable loss." Ask Jerry Sloan or Gregg Popovich if there's such a thing as an acceptable loss. (Check that, maybe Coach Pop would call his scrubs losing to the Nuggets by a handful of points after sitting his starters an "acceptable loss").
But at least Karl is a better poet than Jewel or Viggo Mortensen. So he has that going for him, which is nice.
While Karl may see sunshine in the air, I see a hot Thunder team coming to town. I see a team that's won five of their last six games, and should have beaten the Nuggets in both games the teams played at Oklahoma City this season. The Nuggets needed a Carmelo Anthony miracle shot to win the first game and a bad call/another Melo game-winner to pull off the second game. But this Thunder team isn't handing out wins at the airport anymore. And they've even done something this week that the Nuggets couldn't do: win in @#$%& Sacramento!!!
As pointed out in my Monday night column, the NBA has handed the Nuggets a gift schedule over the remaining 17 games. Karl has a golden opportunity to salvage a once-great Nuggets season and guide the Nuggets to a three or a four-seed and a division lead. I want to see timeouts called within two possessions of the Nuggets letting a big lead slip away. I want to see technical fouls because he's working the refs over. And I want to see him screaming at his players in the huddle regardless of what the score is. A friend of mine sat right next to the Celtics' bench during the Celts' 114-76 blowout win over our Nuggets. He told me that Celtics' coach Doc Rivers was screaming at his team during every timeout and during every possession - even when the outcome of the game was no longer in doubt - as if Game 7 of the NBA Finals was on the line. That's what we need to see out of Karl. The "I'm at peace with myself" Zen nonsense that Karl has fallen back into needs to be taken over by the Furious George who yelled at these players before training camp started and demanded a better defensive effort earlier in the season.
But this isn't all on Karl. Carmelo Anthony needs to take responsibility, as well. Starting tonight, every time Melo shoots less than eight free throws in a game, he's staying with Karl on the Stiff List. Forget the defense, Melo, you just don't have it in you. But Melo should be punishing opponents by taking the ball to the rack. Over his last seven games, Melo is averaging 4.7 free throw attempts per night. That's unacceptably low for a player of Melo's calibre. Even in the Nuggets big wins over the Blazers, Lakers and Hawks, Melo shot just six, four and two free throws, respectively. And Melo - having missed 13 games due to injury and three more due to suspension - has absolutely no excuse to be fatigued.
Before I actually get to work for the day, I want to respond to a few of the comments from Monday's post written by Denver Stiffs reader "E" which, like most of the comments we get here, was very well thought out and well written - a credit to this blog's readers and their passion for the Nuggets. Yesterday, "E" wrote, among other things:
Andrew. No offense, but you softened up on Karl with comments like "giving credit where it's due (paraphrased)" and with posts titled "Best. Start. Ever." This is not something that was hard to see coming. This slump was inevitable. Your positivity and loyalty as a fan are both remarkable and laughable for obvious reasons. I sometimes wonder if Karl's lawyer didn't get to you. Did you really believe in the original title of this site, or did you just want a catchy name to jump-start this blog?
When I read comments like this, I feel like the anchors on CNBC who cheerleaded the stock market run up and then gave us no warnings about the market collapsing. But I have a few responses and you can take them for what they're worth.
First off, before the season even began Denver Stiffs predicted that the Nuggets would finish 8th in the conference. A prediction, by the way, that no one else agreed with except a few loyal Nuggets fans like me. And I don't think anyone - including me - had the Nuggets pegged for a 50-win season (we also didn't know that the Nuggets would get Chauncey Billups, a healthy Nene and a rejuvenated Chris Andersen in place of a petulant Allen Iverson, an aging Marcus Camby and a now oft-injured Eduardo Najera). This doesn't mean we should be satisfied with just 50 wins and an 8th-seed, because we shouldn't. It just means that the expectations were low going into the season and when the Nuggets began exceeding them out of the gate, it didn't make any sense to me to bag on the coach every day. Knowing that Karl was giving a visibly better effort than last season combined with the new players on the roster, I felt like the Nuggets were on to something special and wanted to enjoy it, not tear it down. I won't apologize for being a fan.
Second, even when this site was known as FGK.com, I have always said you can't have it both ways: criticize the coach when the team is down but not give him any credit when they're up. If you do that, you lose credibility with your argument on both ends. Therefore, when the Nuggets were playing well, I believed (and still believe) that Karl deserved credit for this and made a concerted effort to say so. And it's not like I spared Karl any criticism along the way. I've constantly harped on the over-use of the front line, the inconsistent rotations, the inability to call a timeout before the Nuggets completely give a lead away, the lack of play calling, the mysterious non-use of Renaldo Balkman and the bizarre handling of J.R. Smith. I'm just not going to be like Rush Limbaugh who's openly rooting for Barack Obama to fail. I don't want Karl to fail, I want him to succeed and when he succeeds, I'll give him props for doing so.
Third, I changed this site's name to DenverStiffs.com for an assortment of reasons that I encourage readers to revisit if you have time. But the general gist of the name change was that what started as a "fire the coach" blog quickly morphed into a general Nuggets blog, and that's the space I'm much more adept at writing in. And even though FGK.com might have unintentionally been a great way to kick off a Nuggets blog, since changing the name this site's traffic has quadrupled and routinely gets about as many page views, hits and comments than all other Nuggets blogs combined (and you should see my e-mail box every day, too). More to the point, I can't and won't spend every day of my life ragging on George Karl, but I can spend every day of my life writing about my favorite basketball team.
While we're at it, let's set the record straight on where Denver Stiffs stands with George Karl. With 17 games left in what's been a sometimes remarkable but recently very frustrating season, firing Karl now a) won't change anything and b) won't happen anyway. You really think Adrian Dantley or Chad Iske will guide the Nuggets to the promised land? That being said, I will uphold the mantra of this site from last season: if the Nuggets miss the playoffs or make the playoffs but lose in the first round for the sixth consecutive season (five under George Karl), Denver Stiffs will demand a coaching change.
34 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Is there?
by Anonymous on Mar 11, 2009 11:14 AM MDT reply actions
by Anonymous on Mar 11, 2009 11:45 AM MDT reply actions
Tonight's game is easily the most frightening game of the season now. Before the break i had this pegged as a no contest win (on my at home prediction sheet), now I'm not so sure. I do know the team as constructed is capable of winning, but the expectations of their execution is suspect at best.
Tonight needs to be a blowout of historic proportions. I want tonight's game mentioned 20 years from now as one of the top five all-time worst A$$ whompings in sports memory. The Nuggs need this win to assure themselves that they can dominate a hot team. I mean complete domination. I want the game to be so lop-sidedly in favor of the Nuggets, that Marlow and Hastings completely stop covering the game and start talking about some random restaurant that has the best chicken fried steak. I want the NBA to institute a "mercy rule" in honor of this game, like little league baseball. I want to see an annual candlelight vigil held each year in rememberance of this monumental victory. I want to hear an ESPN anchor say "Oklahoma hasn't seen destruction like this since the Dust Bowl" word for word.
I want so badly to believe that, maybe just maybe, Karl's system could work for this team. Honestly I don't need the anxiety of two new head coaches in town this October. It is not out of reach for this team to finish in the top 4 spots this year. It's not entirely impossible for this team to win a series against ANY team in the west.
The test starts tonight. It can't be just an eek by win. I love buzzer beaters, but not tonight. This has to be a game where the opposing team losses hope in the first 5 minutes of play. A game that the Nuggets prove they "WON" and not that the other team just lost.
by joelsopinion on Mar 11, 2009 11:51 AM MDT reply actions
The scouting report is out and every team is making a huge effort to send 3 players back on D every time a shot goes up to stop the nuggets fastbreak no matter what.
This leads to the nuggets having to work the half court O, which leads to frustration(they stink at halfcourt O), which leads to a lack of effort on the defensive end.
Remember when the nugs were winning consistently? They gave up a ton of offensive rebounds didn't they? Which gave them opportunities to run since there were only 1 to 2 defenders back, now there are ALWAYS! at least 3 defenders and Billups has nowwhere to go but pull up and take a bad shot or start the half court offense.
Let's see how many thunder are backpedalin to play D tonight whenever a shot goes up.
I am not saying this is the sole cause of the bad play but I think it is a huge factor, The nuggets have no chance at getting better at the halfcourt offense, so how can they adjust for this?
by james b.(seattle) on Mar 11, 2009 12:07 PM MDT reply actions
If you're going to keep him up there, I would think you would at least have to add McDaniels and General Management to the list as well. Otherwise, I'm sure you can find someone more appropriate to add.
But, then again, it's your website.
P.S.
George Karl's "Zen-like Coaching Sytle" can easily be confused with an apathy and/or laziness to do his job. It looks to me that Chauncey does more actual coaching than Karl on some nights.
by viracocha303 on Mar 11, 2009 12:25 PM MDT reply actions
I'd like to reiterate that I didn't mean any disrespect and I left the comment in it's original context to see what type of reaction you would give. I kind of figured that if I fired you up maybe it would somehow get to Karl. That's how desperate I have become as a fan. Basically, I was venting if you couldn't tell. I apologize for throwing jabs like that at something you obviously put time and effort into.
It was admittedly refreshing to see you defend your territory and your motive for starting it as well as the success it has achieved, all in a professional manner. If only the Nuggets could defend their domain half as well. Maybe you should apply for a coaching position.
by E on Mar 11, 2009 1:12 PM MDT reply actions
My man! First things first, unlike Coach Karl, I'm not above criticism and I welcome it. And I treat all the differences between and my readers (both pro and anti-Karl) as "family fights." At the end of the day, we all want the exact same thing: for the Nuggets to win! I especially appreciated your commentary on what's happening with the Nuggets being a "market correction" as opposed to an implosion. As if you couldn't tell, I love analogies to the Nuggets that have nothing to do with basketball.
Keep the good comments coming. It's what makes this blog special and fun to write.
All best,
Andrew
by Andrew on Mar 11, 2009 1:18 PM MDT reply actions
by Goldennugget on Mar 11, 2009 4:23 PM MDT reply actions
Viracocha!
"George Karl's "Zen-like Coaching Sytle" can easily be confused with an apathy and/or laziness to do his job. It looks to me that Chauncey does more actual coaching than Karl on some nights."
by Goldennugget on Mar 11, 2009 4:25 PM MDT reply actions
by 1NUGS1 on Mar 11, 2009 5:24 PM MDT reply actions
by NugzD on Mar 11, 2009 7:48 PM MDT reply actions
by Goldennugget on Mar 12, 2009 12:20 AM MDT reply actions
In contrast, it seems like every time Chauncey misses one of his contested three's the other team gets a layup at the other end. Shooting from the top of the key with a long rebound all of a sudden half the other team is on a fast break.
I am not saying I prefer Chauncey out there than AC. I am saying both need to make intelligent desicisons about acceptable risks.
by NugzD on Mar 12, 2009 8:15 AM MDT reply actions
To the rest of the team. Few people get energized by playing great defense all game. Lets give the big man a couple more touches. The 13 - 14 he's getting now isn't much.
by NugzD on Mar 12, 2009 8:39 AM MDT reply actions
Balkman is now Beastman Jr. Karls should have no doubt/fear of putting him in for valuable minutes. He provides something this team has lacked for a while, and that is flat out hustle. I'm torn on whether or not JR is best suited as a starter or 6th man. While he can get you 18 a game easy, is it better to get that 18 while the starters are resting or as part of the starting 5?
by joelsopinion on Mar 12, 2009 8:39 AM MDT reply actions
I was getting nervous at the end of the first half. 19 point lead cut to 4 - we've seen this play before. Will G.K. ever call a timeout?
Renaldo Balkman. Beast.
Linus Kleiza = no confidence. He missed two layups in a row on fast breaks. Finally started making some shots in the second half. Hopefully he starts making shots again.
I know Bird gets a lot of shots, but he is now reminding me of Camby. Leaves the center to block the shot, the shot is missed but the unguarded center gets the rebound and the dunk.
by KarlSucks on Mar 12, 2009 8:41 AM MDT reply actions
I think you have to start J.R. and you need Kleiza to play that 6th man role. If they had another offensively competent 2, I could see J.R. off the bench but with KMart/Petro/Balkman starting at 4/5, having Jones at 2 means the defense only really has to defend 3 players.
by KarlSucks on Mar 12, 2009 8:45 AM MDT reply actions
You know he stands out more than another player and is the most unnoticed.
His play tonight was consistent with his performance in the few minutes he has had this season.
Reminds me of Dennis Rodman. Just imagine that we have a Rodman for our team.
by Anonymous on Mar 12, 2009 9:00 AM MDT reply actions
Bad point Anon, I don't want to picture Balkman in a wedding dress, or see him on The Apprentice anytime soon.
by joelsopinion on Mar 12, 2009 9:50 AM MDT reply actions
"ATLANTA -- Let's get right to the three key numbers from Wednesday: 1, 9 and 12.
Twelve is the big number you'll hear about, because Utah's 12-game winning streak ended in a 100-93 loss to the Hawks thanks to 31 points from Joe Johnson, Josh Smith's best game in several weeks and a lengthy, productive first-half cameo from Mario West.
But going forward, it's the 1 and the 9 that are of much greater concern.
The number 1, because after Wednesday that's still the number of times the Jazz have beaten a winning team on the road this year. Yes, just once: a 120-114 overtime win at Detroit on Dec. 19. They lost their other 10 tries -- make that 11 after Wednesday -- and most of them weren't even close: only two were decided by six points or less. "
Mordecai
by Anonymous on Mar 12, 2009 10:07 AM MDT reply actions
Thats why we won..
by Anonymous on Mar 12, 2009 10:15 AM MDT reply actions
He asked about why he hadn't played Balkman much, about if Balkman would get more playing time and how or why Karl decided to play certain people.
Karl had some good answers, some dumb answers.
He said that he would rather play one guy 20-25 minutes than play two or three guys 10 minutes. He said that he was going to watch his guys carefully because he was worried about fatigue coming into the playoffs. He was pressed whether or not he looked at match ups and he had a sort of non-committal answer that said he factored that in, but it really was a matter of many things that he had to consider.
by Denverson on Mar 12, 2009 11:52 AM MDT reply actions
As far as YOU don't want to hear anymore hate about Anthony Carter, who died and left you in charge?
Hart didn't get the opportunity to play, why? Right! GK played Chauncy without any rest in order to save AC's sorry ass. GK knowing that if he gave Hart PT he probably would have outperformed
the POS D leauger. Almost like Balkman is outshining Kmart. One good game and he's all of that.
You need to put down that crack pipe you're smoking from.
And please no long winded sermons or stats. This was the OKC Thunder, who was on a back to back.
Get REAL Man!
by samiam on Mar 12, 2009 11:57 AM MDT reply actions
Steven A. Smith's plea to Melo to grow up and graduate from the '03 draft class.
I'd like to hear some of your comments about what Melo is remebered for at this point in his career.
Personally, I'd rather have him over anyone else in the league (including Kobe) to have the ball in the final seconds of a close game.
by emptytwo629 on Mar 12, 2009 12:45 PM MDT reply actions
Denver is 6-1 when balkman starts. I wonder if Jones also started any of those games...
by KarlSucks on Mar 12, 2009 3:58 PM MDT reply actions
Vince Carter is a perfect example of what happens when your talent peaks ahead of your circumstances. Sure he'll be known as a tremendous athlete and competitor, but not as a guy that won consistantly. AI is another good example of what happens if you're in the wrong place/wrong team when your skills peak. Great player, but never got to wave a championship banner.
Melo is only 25 (I think) so he's got a lot of basketball left to play. I do think he is all too often put under a microscope (myself included) as to why he hasn't accomplished what LBJ and D-Wade have. We need to remember, that he ended up on the western conference in one of the most talented eras the NBA has seen.
D-Wade and LBJ are in the east, and until recently the east has been the easier conference to win in. Think about it. With the Nuggets previous season(s) win/loss ratio, the Nuggets would have been a top 4 seed each year. They could have ended up in a couple of conference title match ups.
Melo's career though has always been in the west. With Kobe,Dirk, Timmy, Parker, Manu, Boozer, Nash, CP3, T-Mac, and Yao. Those weren't the guys he matched up against every now and then, but nightly. So I think in all fairness, he's had a tougher fought career than his peers.
That's not to say he is without blame. He still needs to show heart consistantly in every game. He needs to hit that next level. That's 2 cents anyways.
by joelsopinion on Mar 12, 2009 4:05 PM MDT reply actions
by Goldennugget on Mar 12, 2009 4:25 PM MDT reply actions
If I was you I would call Samian out on his general intelligence. It's hypocrite, wishy-washy, leaguer and of course Chauncey. One or two I could understand, four, well...
by Anonymous on Mar 12, 2009 9:40 PM MDT reply actions
I wonder if any members of the Nuggets org, including the players (but most notably the coach), watched the 6 overtime game tonight. I bet they could have learned a whole lot about the game they get paid millions of dollars to play.
by Goldennugget on Mar 13, 2009 3:49 AM MDT reply actions
P-man
by Anonymous on Mar 13, 2009 11:47 AM MDT reply actions
by Anonymous on Mar 14, 2009 11:20 AM MDT reply actions
by samiam on Mar 14, 2009 9:03 PM MDT reply actions


















