Never a dull night at Pepsi Center...
Nuggets/Suns recap...They take ill-advised three-pointers with way too much time left on the shot clock. Their rotations aren't consistent whatsoever. They continually piss away healthy third quarter leads. They turn the ball over inexplicably. 40 games into the season, I don't think they've run a single set play. Not one. And as far as I'm concerned, if Kenyon Martin never takes another long-range jump shot, it will be too soon (and no, I don't care about his record three-point shooting this season).
And yet - and go ahead, call me a sucker - I love watching this team, play. Absolutely love them.
At the conclusion of the Nuggets next game we'll have reached the halfway mark of the 2008-09 NBA Season, and I think I'm finally starting to realize who these Nuggets are: erratic, mind-numbing, exhilarating, escape artists and, dare I say, winners. These guys know how to win games, and that might be their most important attribute going into the second half of what's sure to be a grueling fight for home court in the postseason. And believe me, this Nuggets team desperately needs the home court advantage if they're going to win a playoff series (for once).
On a side note, the Suns resting Shaquille O'Neal tonight made no sense whatsoever. I (sort of) understand why the Suns are giving Shaq a break on the first or second of their back-to-backs all season. But wouldn't they rather play Shaq against a very good Nuggets team they might need a tiebreaker against than an awful Timberwolves team they face off against in Phoenix the next day?
Nuggets/Suns preview (posted earlier)...
I'm sorry I didn't get a chance to recap the Nuggets/Mavericks game but I want to thank all the readers for picking up the slack and leaving such detailed comments afterward. For those of you who might be curious, my ACL surgery went as well as it could. Right now I'm laying comfortably on my couch with an ice machine pumping cool air on my knee and am very much looking forward to tonight's TNT doubleheader.For the second game of the doubleheader, the Nuggets face off against an opponent similar to the Mavericks: the Phoenix Suns. Like the Mavericks, it seems like yesterday that the Suns were one of the most feared, deep, versatile teams in the Western Conference and yet today they're old, have no bench, no future and yet remain talented enough to cause trouble in the postseason for any opponent.
The Nuggets haven't lost to the Suns in Denver for two years and seem to play fairly confidently against them at Pepsi Center. Shaquille O'Neal in particular seems to get tired early at 5,280 feet. Remember how awful he played against the Nuggets last season while still a member of the Heat?
Earlier this season, the Nuggets played the Suns pretty well until the final moments of their December 20th matchup which the Nuggets eventually lost 108-101. If you remember, Carmelo Anthony shot a dreadful 3-13 that night and it was apparent that he was having elbow problems. So if you consider that the Nuggets almost beat the Suns in Phoenix with Melo shooting 3-13, we have every reason to be optimistic that they'll beat the Suns in Denver tonight, even without Melo.
Go Nuggets!!
26 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
by Julian from Australia on Jan 15, 2009 7:44 PM MST reply actions
by Adam on Jan 15, 2009 10:03 PM MST reply actions
by john on Jan 15, 2009 10:16 PM MST reply actions
by Anonymous on Jan 15, 2009 11:19 PM MST reply actions
by Goldennugget on Jan 15, 2009 11:48 PM MST reply actions
Mordecai
by Anonymous on Jan 16, 2009 12:35 AM MST reply actions
ON THE OTHER HAND, he had one play in the second half where he got the ball, took two or three dribbles and shot a pull up jumper which had absolutely no fucking chance of going in the basket.
I was only able to watch the second half, but I thought the Nuggets did a pretty good job of rotating out on shooters (although it hurt their defensive rebounding at times). It seemed like their pick and roll defense was outstanding as well. I remember suns games over the past few years where they would run the same god damn Nash/Stoudemaire pick and roll play every time down the court and it would work. It was nice to see the nugs have some methods of countering that 2-man game.
by Brian on Jan 16, 2009 12:47 AM MST reply actions
most probably we have to give chauncey credit for that, too
by MZG on Jan 16, 2009 12:54 AM MST reply actions
And the game was good.
Jr played well
+18 when jr is on the floor
-13 when Ac is on the floor
enough said.
by Riso on Jan 16, 2009 2:22 AM MST reply actions
It's tough for me to say, but the guards and Nene have to be blamed for not getting him the ball earlier in the 4th, and Karl needs to be comended for making an adjustment.
by john on Jan 16, 2009 7:18 AM MST reply actions
by Eric K on Jan 16, 2009 8:13 AM MST reply actions
Karl got his timeout bonus again. With :17 left, they still had three. Never took timeout when giving up an 8 point lead in the fourth. Then they needed 3 tries to get the ball inbounds against phoenix? Not a team known for defense.
I think all the early in the clock, bad threes were due to Nash. He kept making his, so J.R. and Billups kept trying to respond. If they simply run the (psuedo)offense, they game wouldn't have gone to overtime.
Andrew - since you have now officially blown out your knee, does that mean in two years you will be playing like Nene? Or you could blow out the other and play like Martin.
by KarlSucks on Jan 16, 2009 8:29 AM MST reply actions
When Billups free throw stopped on top of the rim, did that count as a miss?
by KarlSucks on Jan 16, 2009 8:31 AM MST reply actions
Yeah, a miss.
I was at the game last night and the place was packed and full of energy.
Thinking the Nuggets would lose by 6 - 10 points since that is what the first half was revealing, I was astonished that the Nuggets played so well in the third and got themselves back into the game. When was the last time the Nugs played back to win or keep their lead thru the third ?
A great win on a supercharged night a the Pepsi Center.
by markp on Jan 16, 2009 8:45 AM MST reply actions
by 1nugs1 on Jan 16, 2009 8:51 AM MST reply actions
Not sure how much longer this team lasts on an 8-man rotation, but you have got to admire the way this team is holding together against playoff caliber teams with Melo out of action.
by JTR on Jan 16, 2009 9:12 AM MST reply actions
tell you what... i'd enjoy a dull night at the pepsi center. when this explodes and we start to lose these games from poor shot selection and standing around on the floor, the whining will be heard around the world.
by Anonymous on Jan 16, 2009 9:22 AM MST reply actions
Please stop exaggerating that the Nuggets never run set plays. This was true last year but definitely not now. I lurk here because of my hatred for Karl's coaching but I still watch the games with objectivity, and they run set plays all the time. Now they don't always work, mainly because the players seem to be merely going through the motions instead of making crisp cuts and well-positioned screens, but that doesn't mean they're not running them. Hopefully they can clean this up. If I had to guess, I'd say fatigue is to blame, which of course is due to Karl's 8-man rotation. Sure would be nice to see Balkman out there making steals, offensive rebounds and clean cuts and picks.
by Anonymous on Jan 16, 2009 9:26 AM MST reply actions
Every time the Nuggets have the ball on offense I'm not sure what's going to happen. I think we cheer simply because we're so delighted they somehow made *something* go in the hoop.
Maybe "plays" is the wrong term to use here. Maybe fundamentals would be more appropriate.
But, like Andrew says, this makes them more fun to watch. But will it fly during the playoffs? I guess we'll have to wait and see...
On another note, for a such smart player Chauncey can sure take some boneheaded shots. It drives me crazy.
by Do We Have Any Plays? on Jan 16, 2009 10:10 AM MST reply actions
Also, I was at the game last night. I thought it wasn't a bad game, although as other people have mentioned, both JR and Billups jacked too many threes. I don't mind if they can spot up, or even from time to time as a sort of gamble. But too often we didn't even swing the ball around or try to get it inside, just got to the line and jacked it. I don't know if this is Karl's work or not but I didn't see a whole lot of ball movement the whole game. The Suns, on the other hand, were able to get a lot of easy shots for guys close in, Hill and Barnes especially.
by Denverson on Jan 16, 2009 10:50 AM MST reply actions
by Goldennugget on Jan 16, 2009 11:42 AM MST reply actions
I agree GK isn't always what we'd like, but really, this place deserves a better title, doesn't it?
This has evolved into a great place to read and comment about the Nuggets, and somehow "Fire George Karl" seems demeaning, both to the blog and to George this year.
by Marty on Jan 16, 2009 12:13 PM MST reply actions
by Zachm219 on Jan 16, 2009 12:17 PM MST reply actions
by John on Jan 16, 2009 1:07 PM MST reply actions
I almost threw a remote at the TV last night. I can't stand TNT's broadcasts. Yes, we know you have like a hundred HD cameras all over the building. No, I don't want you to cut to as many of them as you can while the ball is in play. And what ever happened to announcers discussing the happenings on the court? Yes, thank you for reminding me about Nene's single nut, KMart's two microfracture surgeries, and Grant Hill's missed 7 years. Think you could maybe tell me about how they're playing RIGHT NOW?! Please?
So I know I'm supposed to think Mark Cuban is a douch nozzle and all, but does anyone else wish he'd buy the Rockies? Could you ever imagine him trading Matt Holliday for a lump of coal and two shit sandwiches? I'm just sayin' is all...
I honestly thought the Mavs/Suns/Magic stretch sans Melo would be three losses. I guess two of three ain't bad. And yes, that does indicate my prediction for the Orlando game...
I want Jim Armstrong's job.
by Anonymous on Jan 16, 2009 2:26 PM MST reply actions
no idea why they rested shaq either. they lost to the wolves with him anyway. maybe they thought with melo out, this team would give in. not so i guess.
by andrew fisher on Jan 17, 2009 3:47 AM MST reply actions


















