Training camp preview...
When you return to a state where you're already a registered sex offender, do you have to re-register? Or is your original registration good for life? This was the first question that came to mind when I read that Ruben "The Babysitter Raper" Patterson will be back with the Nuggets for training camp today.Throw in a training camp invite to Smush Parker (that's right, SMUSH @#$%& PARKER) and it's apparent that Kroenke Crony Mark Warkentien's push to make the Nuggets the most undersized, one-dimensional, undisciplined and arrested team with the biggest "trainwreck" upside in the NBA this season is coming into full effect.
Including Patterson and Parker, of the Nuggets 18 training camp attendees eight have either been arrested, suspended by the NBA, yelled at their coach during a game, refused to re-enter a game, fought with teammates, skipped practice, or all of the above. I never thought I'd say this, but Warkentien is out-Warkentiening himself. Now that's playing chess, alright.
According to the other Kroenke Crony, Rex Chapman, it's still "up in the air" if the Nuggets keep more than 13 of the 18 players in training camp on the opening day roster. But let's pretend for a second that the Nuggets add two more players...who would you choose? Our choices are Mateen Cleaves, Nick Fazekas, James Mays, Patterson and Parker.
Note that Elton Brown - an NBDL and Summer League standout - didn't make the training camp roster. What gives?
Regardless of who fills out a potential 15-man roster, these last two players will join Dahntay Jones, Sonny Weems and Stephen Hunter in the "no-impact" department on the Nuggets roster. But with Kenyon Martin and Nene remaining injury prone, and Chucky Atkins out for a few months, you never know who will be called in for duty.
If I had to pick two of these guys, I'd go with Fazekas and Cleaves (and I'd send Parker home yesterday). Fazekas - born and raised in Arvada - would be the end-of-the-bench, big, white Stiff that the Nuggets have sorely missed since the departure of Mark Pope in 2005 and Dan McClintock in 2001. The Nuggets just aren't the same without a big Stiff on the bench, so this should be a shoe-in.
And my second choice would be Cleaves. Not because he's any good (he's not), but because the Nuggets are in short supply of solid citizens and it wouldn't hurt to have someone on the team who's a pass-first player. At least one.
Back to Patterson, with the Nuggets already committing to high energy guys like Renaldo Balkman and Chris Andersen, I see absolutely no need for the chemistry-poisoning, me-first Patterson to rejoin the franchise. Why even risk it?
Have I mentioned yet how excited I am for this season to start?!!
26 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
by danjustin on Sep 30, 2008 1:23 AM MDT reply actions
by john on Sep 30, 2008 7:22 AM MDT reply actions
then they will trade their late lottery pick to the Clippers for a conditional protected future 2nd rounder in 2013
by Dave on Sep 30, 2008 7:51 AM MDT reply actions
by Anonymous on Sep 30, 2008 8:21 AM MDT reply actions
At a time like this one can't express himself properly...
"You blew it all up"
I'm just happy that I don't hold season tix
by joelsopinion on Sep 30, 2008 8:35 AM MDT reply actions
by LB47 on Sep 30, 2008 9:42 AM MDT reply actions
Don't expect the other guys to make the roster. Cleaves has the most chance and then Fazekas but that's it. They signed Jones and Weems and they'll probably stick as bench fodder. Patterson is rendered obsolete by Balkman.
The only interesting story in training camp is whether JR can establish himself as a starter over AC.
by Haig on Sep 30, 2008 12:33 PM MDT reply actions
by Chris C. on Sep 30, 2008 2:31 PM MDT reply actions
by Chris C. on Sep 30, 2008 5:12 PM MDT reply actions
by Goldennugget on Sep 30, 2008 8:02 PM MDT reply actions
by Anonymous on Sep 30, 2008 8:50 PM MDT reply actions
by nickademus on Sep 30, 2008 9:23 PM MDT reply actions
by Paterade on Sep 30, 2008 10:31 PM MDT reply actions
by rauf is on fire on Oct 1, 2008 6:01 AM MDT reply actions
by Anonymous on Oct 1, 2008 8:11 AM MDT reply actions
I do agree with the AC at point debacle that Karl is creating. We are something like 20ish and 3 when Iverson has 10 or more dimes and he averaged a few more per game last year than AC. I really believe that Iverson is willing to do whatever it takes to win this year (i.e. sharing the rock) so with him at point and JR at the 2 we are a much more explosive team. Forget about this team playing defense because it just wont happen so we might as well put our highest scoring line up in and try and run it up on everyone.
by Anonymous on Oct 1, 2008 10:54 AM MDT reply actions
by alexridesbikes on Oct 1, 2008 2:09 PM MDT reply actions
Plus,everybody seems to forget that we got that $10 Million for that Camby trade,so if they see a hole,they might trade to fix that.
by Anonymous on Oct 1, 2008 3:04 PM MDT reply actions
by nickademus on Oct 1, 2008 9:14 PM MDT reply actions
by Jack on Oct 1, 2008 10:29 PM MDT reply actions
In one of his comments, Kemp Jr. says that 2 teams have shown minor interest in him and makes reference to Steven Hunter.
Just wondering, does that mean Denver is one of those 2 teams? Probably a good thing to blog about Andrew... Thanks for doin this too man.
by Jack on Oct 2, 2008 4:34 AM MDT reply actions
by Anonymous on Oct 2, 2008 5:21 AM MDT reply actions
Bamby didnt play like he was capable of consistently. that's game to game quarter to quarter- name it!!
He let so many layups past i could of scored on him.
Karl loved najera too much. Im glad he's gone to
Nuggets will be better defensively because of hustle. No lazy camby
by Anonymous on Oct 2, 2008 6:19 AM MDT reply actions
by Iverson Warrior on Oct 2, 2008 6:48 AM MDT reply actions
by Zachm219 on Oct 2, 2008 11:04 AM MDT reply actions
by Anonymous on Oct 2, 2008 4:40 PM MDT reply actions


















