Team USA looks too much like the Nuggets...
My skepticism about Dwyane Wade being healthy enough for Team USA proved to be totally idiotic and unfounded. But after watching the four "friendlies" (by the way, when did soccer terms creep into basketball? I'm not happy about this - it's an "exhibition," not a "friendly!") that took place in Macao and Shanghai, I came to a scary realization: these guys look like the 2007-08 Denver Nuggets.Tell me if this sounds familiar...
"Porous defense, inside and outside. Abysmal 3-point shooting. Bad free-throw shooting. Sloppiness with the ball."
...and...
"They need to play smarter, they need to play better, and they need to get a grip on the fact that there are going to be nights when mistakes, hubris and failed defensive execution are going to put them in grave danger."
That's ESPN.com's Chris Sheridan's description of Team USA after today's squeaker against the Australians sans Andrew Bogut, but he might as well been describing last season's Nuggets.
Like our Nuggets of 2007-08, Team USA is supremely talented and flat out spectacular in transition. But also like our Nuggets, Team USA is plagued by too much one-on-one basketball, too many rushed shots, bad execution with the half court offense, indecision against zone defenses, inconsistent outside and free throw shooting, and no backup big men.
Team USA is so talented that it can - almost - get away with this type of play against the Aussies, Turks and Russians, just as the Nuggets got away with their sloppy play against lesser opponents or in home games en route to 50 regular season wins. But what's going to happen when Team USA faces superior international teams that play great as a unit like Greece, Spain or Argentina? Will they bow out as the one-on-one Nuggets did against the team-oriented Lakers in the playoffs?
I might be the biggest Nuggets fan on the planet, but the last thing I want to see is Team USA emulating us. Put me down for very concerned going into the Olympics, downgraded from slightly concerned.
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
1) Defend the 3-point line: As with Greece in 2006, the short line equalizes the USA's explosiveness toward the basket... turning our penchant for spectacular alley-oops into an entertaining brand of losing basketball. It doesn't take a MIT professor to figure out that trading 2 for 3 isn't a recipe for success.
2) Stay focused: Most of the sloppy ball-handling and turnovers come from a bored USA team hoping to entertain themselves making a spectacular play rather than steadily building a lead making the right play. Teams stay in games because the USA has a tendency to either play down to their level or throw away opportunities on the offensive end.
That's it. Two things to keep in mind and team USA should be fine. We'll see what happens. Team USA has a treacherous road and can very well lose to half the field, so it will be interesting.
by rauf is on fire on Aug 5, 2008 5:56 PM MDT reply actions
by Anonymous on Aug 5, 2008 8:37 PM MDT reply actions
by goldennugget on Aug 5, 2008 8:57 PM MDT reply actions
by Pacman14 on Aug 5, 2008 10:06 PM MDT reply actions
by andrew fisher on Aug 6, 2008 12:52 AM MDT reply actions
by nataly on Aug 6, 2008 7:03 AM MDT reply actions
Bottom line is, the Nuggets, er, USA won't win it all unless they have at least 30-35% from 3 point land. Not asking too much.
by Robin Z on Aug 6, 2008 9:44 AM MDT reply actions
(1) The Nuggets had a starting point guard who John Hollinger called "one of the worst shooters at the guard position in recent NBA history."
(2) The Nuggets had a starting center who contributed next to nothing on offense and, while he has received many defensive accolades, had virtually no chance at successfully guarding any center in the NBA one-on-one.
(3) If my life was on the line based on whether the NBA player of my choosing would miss an open 15 footer even though he was trying, I would choose the Nuggets' starting power forward. Oh yeah, this player has a max contract.
(4) The Nuggets' backup point guard is short, old, and not particularly good at anything.
(5) our backup PF/C makes $10 million a year and is always injured, always overweight, and never averaged better than 10 and 6 in any season. As a side note, though, God bless this man in his recovery from cancer.
(6) Of the Nuggets' two most efficient offensive players, one hardly played for half of the season because he was "immature" and the other can either dunk or hit a three pointer, but is lucky to draw iron on a mid-range shot.
(7) The Nuggets had a talented defender who was extremely efficient on offense, but was relegated to backup duty behind the aforementioned power forward who was never taught to shoot yet makes $92 million over seven years.
The Nuggets last year were not that talented (and the players who are talented see far too little playing time) and were put together with no concept of how to build a basketball team (See: 2002-2004 Team USA).
The bad news is that next year will probably be worse.
I was secretly hoping that the Nuggets would try to sign and trade for Emeka Okafor (with the trade exception) and pursue Louis Williams as a restricted FA from Philly. Think of a young core (after the subtraction of AI) of Williams, J.R., 'Melo, Okafor, Nene, and Kleiza. You can compete for a title with that core.
Too bad there is no chance of that happening now.
Oh well, go Nuggets and Team USA anyway.
by Matthew on Aug 6, 2008 12:22 PM MDT reply actions
(1) The Nuggets had a starting point guard who John Hollinger called "one of the worst shooters at the guard position in recent NBA history."
(2) The Nuggets had a starting center who contributed next to nothing on offense and, while he has received many defensive accolades, had virtually no chance at successfully guarding any center in the NBA one-on-one.
(3) If my life was on the line based on whether the NBA player of my choosing would miss an open 15 footer even though he was trying, I would choose the Nuggets' starting power forward. Oh yeah, this player has a max contract.
(4) The Nuggets' backup point guard is short, old, and not particularly good at anything.
(5) our backup PF/C makes $10 million a year and is always injured, always overweight, and never averaged better than 10 and 6 in any season. As a side note, though, God bless this man in his recovery from cancer.
(6) Of the Nuggets' two most efficient offensive players, one hardly played for half of the season because he was "immature" and the other can either dunk or hit a three pointer, but is lucky to draw iron on a mid-range shot.
(7) The Nuggets had a talented defender who was extremely efficient on offense, but was relegated to backup duty behind the aforementioned power forward who was never taught to shoot yet makes $92 million over seven years.
The Nuggets last year were not that talented (and the players who are talented see far too little playing time) and were put together with no concept of how to build a basketball team (See: 2002-2004 Team USA).
The bad news is that next year will probably be worse.
I was secretly hoping that the Nuggets would try to sign and trade for Emeka Okafor (with the trade exception) and pursue Louis Williams as a restricted FA from Philly. Think of a young core (after the subtraction of AI) of Williams, J.R., 'Melo, Okafor, Nene, and Kleiza. You can compete for a title with that core.
Too bad there is no chance of that happening now.
Oh well, go Nuggets and Team USA anyway.
by Matthew on Aug 7, 2008 1:45 AM MDT reply actions
Bottom line is, the Nuggets, er, USA won't win it all unless they have at least 30-35% from 3 point land. Not asking too much.
by Robin Z on Aug 7, 2008 1:45 AM MDT reply actions
by nataly on Aug 7, 2008 1:46 AM MDT reply actions
by andrew fisher on Aug 7, 2008 1:46 AM MDT reply actions
by pacman14 on Aug 7, 2008 1:46 AM MDT reply actions
by goldenugget on Aug 7, 2008 1:47 AM MDT reply actions
by Anonymous on Aug 7, 2008 1:47 AM MDT reply actions


















