So what have we learned about the Nuggets?...
Don't quote me on this, but I believe it was Jon Barry who - while calling the Nuggets last game in February, against the Clippers on ESPN - said something like "we're going to learn a lot about the Denver Nuggets over the next five games." Barry was referring to the Nuggets upcoming five games at Houston, home vs. Phoenix and San Antonio, and finally at Utah and San Antonio. (By the way, Jon Barry as a coaching candidate? Sounds good, huh? Anyone? Anyone? We'll get to that another day).So what have we learned after going 2-3 on this stretch, with no road wins, culminating with tonight's tough loss to Los Spurs? I offer the following observations, excluding the obvious critiques that fans and the media have called out all season (like inability to commit on defense, inconsistent effort from one night to the next, etc)...
-The Nuggets can't win a road game against a well-coached team (i.e. Houston, Utah and San Antonio). In fact, the Nuggets are 2-10 on the road against Western Conference Playoff teams. One of their big road wins? At Dallas against Avery Johnson. Exactly.
-After two years with essentially the same set of players, they're still incapable of running any plays in a half court set down the stretch (as evident in tonight's loss when the Spurs went on an 11-2 scoring run at the tail end of the fourth quarter while putting the clamps on the Nuggets offense). Given that this was one of the main problems against the Spurs in the playoffs last year, you'd think after 10 months the coach would figure it out...or at least try to.
-J.R. Smith should have been getting significant minutes all season, and by not doing so may have cost the Nuggets a few games. He's admittedly a wild card, but so is Stephen Jackson (without whom the Warriors are 2-7).
-George Karl doesn't work the refs throughout the game, even though this could help in getting a tough call the Nuggets way down the stretch. Tonight's game against the Spurs was a perfect example of this as the late-in-the-game, close calls all went the Spurs way.
-Rocky doesn't always shoot his behind-the-back-half court shot between the third and fourth quarter, he sometimes performs this amazing feat between the first and second quarter.
-Most depressingly, we're probably not making the playoffs. Check out ESPN.com's Marc Stein's breakdown of the remaining schedules for the West's top nine teams if you want to gauge the Nuggets chances vs. their competitors. Ugh.
And even worse yet, we're in danger of becoming the New York Knicks of the West (ridiculously high payroll, talented individual players, lack of chemistry, questionable coaching and suspect management strategy, etc). I know this may sound a bit extreme, but we as Nuggets fans must demand accountability from top to bottom of the organization. There's just something awry. Something doesn't feel right. How can a team look so good against Phoenix and San Antonio (twice), and yet fail to show up against Houston and Utah, in the most important game of the season? Certainly Coach Karl deserves - as I argue - a great deal of the blame, but as I've said from day one there's more to the story here.
Is it all on Karl? Or the players? Or management? Or past management? I will spend the remainder of the regular season proposing and answering these questions as objectively (and sarcastically) as possible, and will inject Nuggets nostalgia whenever appropriate.
On a positive note, Rocky is leading in our coaching replacement poll. I can't wait to watch Allen Iverson and Carmelo Anthony run the trampoline dunk play in November!
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
by Anonymous on Mar 10, 2008 11:46 PM MDT reply actions
by markp on Mar 11, 2008 12:30 AM MDT reply actions
by aeneas on Mar 11, 2008 1:01 AM MDT reply actions
^Dude Nuggets have done this all season long, not just this game. So it's not just a "4 pt loss to the Spurs in San Antonio". It's much deeper than that.
After this game, I'm convinced all is the fault of the coaching staff, maybe just GK.
I can see players were out there trying, but there's a limit to what they can do.
The coach creates the system and directs the players to follow the system.
But in GK's world, there's no such as "system". It's not in his dictionary.
So if there's no system, everything's left to the players to win the game... so when the Nuggets lose, it's easy to blame the players and not the coach. When, if you observe closely, it must be the coach's fault because there's no system in the first place.
Yes, Melo was frustrated and let the emotions get the best of him but we were there in the end even with him struggling. We needed the X and Os, the timeouts, the direction, the momentum to push us over the top in that type of situations.
It seems, in that situation, GK either does not have a clue what he should do, he just has this philosophy where it's up to the players to win the game and he can't be blamed for any other result.
Is he for real? Expecting people to do the job for him? Not even Michael Corleone was this gangster.
by Anonymous on Mar 11, 2008 2:45 AM MDT reply actions
by Geerten on Mar 11, 2008 3:28 AM MDT reply actions
by aeneas on Mar 11, 2008 5:37 AM MDT reply actions
Did the good effort in this game produce a win? No.
Do we need to play with this effort from now on? Yes. But is it too late? Most probably.
How come Karl can't make the team play like this every game? According to him, it's on the players and he can't be blamed.
by Anonymous on Mar 11, 2008 8:30 AM MDT reply actions
by Iverson Warrior on Mar 11, 2008 8:56 AM MDT reply actions
by LB47 on Mar 11, 2008 9:14 AM MDT reply actions
"I don't think I've ever played hotter teams," Karl said. "A 3-2 record would have been fantastic; 2-3 is acceptable."
3-2 fantastic? 2-3 acceptable?
Yes, they're 5 great teams.
But is this team even in position to worry about other teams than itself?
No. By saying that, it seems Karl has really reduced this team from "championship caliber team" to "8th seed caliber team".
I can't believe he keeps saying "we're in good position" when the Nuggets are not.
It seems like... he hates the Nuggets and the players.
What have the Nuggets ever done to him that he stands in the way of the Nuggets being the team it is capable of being?!?
by Anonymous on Mar 11, 2008 9:23 AM MDT reply actions
This is something they've been doing since the Bzdelick era. Four years, two coaches and another superstar later, they still can't finish games 'gainst the good teams.
Time to start over, Silent Stan... time to start over.
by Anonymous on Mar 11, 2008 3:32 PM MDT reply actions
Simmons: How dysfunctional on a scale of 1-to-10 (are the Nuggets)
Bucher: It's not dysfunctional, it's simply that you have a talented group of guys who all believe that 'if I play my game, we'll win', and nobody is sacrificing their game to make it work with the rest of the team. And George Karl is of the mind, and he started this way from the beginning, that I have a bunch of veteran crazy guys, I can't be Mean ol' George, I gotta be Nice George. There has never been a level of accountability there that you need. And once you go there, I don’t know that you can go back.
by Lord Sam on Mar 11, 2008 4:35 PM MDT reply actions

















